Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.4 mini vs. GLM-5.1

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

115

shared result series

16

distinct benchmarks

2026-08-16

latest retrieval

Change model selection

Specifications and cost

General specifications and standard API pricing

Undisclosed parameter counts and knowledge cutoffs stay marked as unavailable. The table shows direct standard token pricing, including documented context tiers. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

Specifications and API pricing for GPT-5.4 mini and GLM-5.1
AttributeGPT-5.4 miniGLM-5.1
ProviderOpenAIZ.ai
ReleasedMar 2026Apr 7, 2026
AvailabilityActiveOpen Source
Model typeProprietaryOpen Weights
ParametersNot published744B, 40B active
ArchitectureNot publishedMixture of Experts
Context window400,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoffAugust 31, 2025Not published
Technical sourcesModelModel, Context
API pricing per 1M tokens
API input$0.75$1.4
API output$4.5$4.4
Cache read$0.07$0.26
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified07/30/2026Source07/30/2026Source
GPT-5.4 miniGLM-5.1
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.4 mini$0.75Lower price
GLM-5.1$1.4
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.4 mini$4.5
GLM-5.1$4.4Lower price
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.4 mini$0.075Lower price
GLM-5.1$0.26

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

115 shared result series
GPT-5.4 miniGLM-5.1
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-5.4 mini1,448.205 arena points
GLM-5.11,466.935 arena pointsHigher measured value
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini12.936 %
GLM-5.125.768 %Winner
CorpFin v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini60.917 %
GLM-5.164.452 %Winner
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini45.36 %Winner
GLM-5.144.792 %
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini83.08 %
GLM-5.184.518 %Winner
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini0 %Tie
GLM-5.10 %Tie
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini12.5 %
GLM-5.127.885 %Winner
LiveCodeBench v6Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini81.465 %Winner
GLM-5.181.38 %
MMLU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini84.554 %
GLM-5.186.9 %Winner
ProgramBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini0 %Tie
GLM-5.10 %Tie
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini73 %
GLM-5.176.4 %Winner
TaxEval v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.4 mini71.218 %Winner
GLM-5.171.194 %
Benchmark scores for GPT-5.4 mini and GLM-5.1
Benchmark and taskGPT-5.4 miniGLM-5.1ComparabilitySource
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall
1,448.205 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±3.859The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,466.935 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±4.197The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:overallTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4 mini: Style-controlled Arena rating from 59,631 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 39,063 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationOverall
12.936 %
25.768 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1GPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-16-107652dc6bfcRetrieved 2026-08-16
CorpFin v2Overall
60.917 %
64.452 %Winner
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1GPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-16-45bbf84f57abRetrieved 2026-08-16
Finance Agent (v2)Overall
45.36 %Winner
44.792 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4 miniGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-16-8853da43085dRetrieved 2026-08-16
GPQA DiamondOverall
83.08 %
84.518 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1GPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-16-7f8363eaa2dbRetrieved 2026-08-16
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
0 %Tie
0 %Tie
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:overallNo documented setup differenceTieGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-16-bae90566df2fRetrieved 2026-08-16
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass
12.5 %
27.885 %Winner
1all-pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1GPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-16-af296c00ecaaRetrieved 2026-08-16
LiveCodeBench v6Overall
81.465 %Winner
81.38 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4 miniGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-16-17b9c147080dRetrieved 2026-08-16
MMLU-ProOverall
84.554 %
86.9 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1GPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-16-e14d5bb3a34cRetrieved 2026-08-16
ProgramBenchOverall
0 %Tie
0 %Tie
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceTieGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-16-08d9727662ddRetrieved 2026-08-16
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
73 %
76.4 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1GPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-16-c133071b8167Retrieved 2026-08-16
TaxEval v2Overall
71.218 %Winner
71.194 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4 miniGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-16-5bbd495dac53Retrieved 2026-08-16
Terminal-Bench 2.0Overall
44.944 %
53.933 %Winner
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1GPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-16-0d39f2e25723Retrieved 2026-08-16
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall
54.682 %
56.929 %Winner
2.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2-1:2.1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1GPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-1-2026-08-16-b3f38c18bea4Retrieved 2026-08-16
Vals IndexCorpFin v2
60.256 %
65.268 %Higher measured value
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:1.2:corp_fin_v2Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-11-e79d08d59249Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
47.969 %Winner
31.456 %
1.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-vibe-code-bench:1.1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.4 miniGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Harness: OpenHands
GLM-5.1: Harness: OpenHands
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-vibe-code-2026-08-16-a73c9770bcc4Retrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
1,460.132 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±6.68The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,464.98 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±7.499The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4 mini: Style-controlled Arena rating from 12,114 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 7,906 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCLI
8.2 %
18.833 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:cliTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Exact Pages
61.538 %
61.772 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:exact_pagesTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments
45.366 %Higher measured value
43.276 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:adjustmentsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-11-3e5c93a1857cRetrieved 2026-08-11
GPQA DiamondFew-Shot CoT
84.848 %
85.787 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:diamond_few_shot_cotTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-11-d3325290a404Retrieved 2026-08-11
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass
15.152 %
31.818 %Higher measured value
1all-pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:administrative_regulatoryTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-11-326cf7aaca58Retrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6Easy
97.826 %
98.754 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:easyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProBiology
91.353 %
93.724 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:biologyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved
3 %Higher measured value
1 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:almostTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified<15 min fix
85.567 %
88.66 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:<15 min fixTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
TaxEval v2Correctness
63.042 %Higher measured value
61.538 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:correctnessTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-11-d05a40bf446fRetrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0Easy
75 %No direct winner
75 %No direct winner
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:easyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.1Easy
75 %
83.333 %Higher measured value
2.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2-1:2.1:easyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-1-2026-08-11-8f0ebd72a609Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vals IndexFinance Agent v2
45.407 %Higher measured value
44.79 %
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:1.2:finance_agentTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-11-e79d08d59249Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlChinese
1,478.62 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±11.489The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,519.866 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±13.198The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:chineseTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4 mini: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,250 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,373 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCOBOL
27.143 %
46.571 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:cobolTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Max Fitting Context
60.956 %
66.317 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:max_fitting_contextTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass
32.369 %
32.68 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:all_passTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-11-3e5c93a1857cRetrieved 2026-08-11
GPQA DiamondZero-Shot CoT
81.313 %
83.249 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:diamond_zero_shot_cotTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-11-d3325290a404Retrieved 2026-08-11
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit
69.72 %
80.005 %Higher measured value
1weighted partial-credit scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:weighted_pass__administrative_regulatoryTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-11-326cf7aaca58Retrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6Hard
61.714 %Higher measured value
57.429 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:hardTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProBusiness
89.734 %
91.128 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:businessTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchFully Resolved
0 %No direct winner
0 %No direct winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:strictTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified>4 hours
0 %
33.333 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:>4 hoursTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
TaxEval v2Stepwise Reasoning
79.395 %
80.851 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:stepwise_reasoningTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-11-d05a40bf446fRetrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0Hard
24.444 %
36.667 %Higher measured value
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:hardTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.1Hard
34.444 %
37.778 %Higher measured value
2.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2-1:2.1:hardTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-1-2026-08-11-8f0ebd72a609Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vals IndexSWE-bench
67.647 %
72.549 %Winner
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:1.2:swebenchNo documented setup differenceWinner: GLM-5.1GPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-11-e79d08d59249Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlCoding
1,496.777 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±6.045The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,515.299 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±6.649The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:codingTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4 mini: Style-controlled Arena rating from 16,275 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,013 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCode Quality
3.053 / 5
3.544 / 5Higher measured value
1mean reviewer code-quality ratingHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:code_qualityTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Shared Max Context
60.256 %
65.268 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:shared_max_contextTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables
40.273 %
41.557 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:comparablesTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-11-3e5c93a1857cRetrieved 2026-08-11
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass
11.628 %
23.256 %Higher measured value
1all-pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:business_commercialTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-11-326cf7aaca58Retrieved 2026-08-11
LiveCodeBench v6Medium
84.856 %
87.958 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-lcb:1:mediumTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-lcb-2026-08-11-0342bcc364e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProChemistry
89.134 %
91.844 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:chemistryTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate
54.375 %Higher measured value
50.879 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:partialTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified1-4 hours
33.333 %
45.238 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:1-4 hoursTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.0Medium
53.939 %
61.818 %Higher measured value
2.0accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2:2.0:mediumTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-06-04Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-2026-08-11-d91717be20e6Retrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.1Medium
64.242 %
65.455 %Higher measured value
2.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2-1:2.1:mediumTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-1-2026-08-11-8f0ebd72a609Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vals IndexTerminal-Bench 2.1
54.682 %
56.929 %Higher measured value
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:1.2:terminal_bench_2_1Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: high, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-11-e79d08d59249Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlCreative writing
1,404.172 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±7.325The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,448.824 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±8.067The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:creative_writingTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4 mini: Style-controlled Arena rating from 9,849 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 6,969 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis
48.338 %
52.713 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:disclosure_analysisTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-11-3e5c93a1857cRetrieved 2026-08-11
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit
71.172 %
81.655 %Higher measured value
1weighted partial-credit scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:weighted_pass__business_commercialTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-11-326cf7aaca58Retrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProComputer Science
87.073 %
89.487 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:computer_scienceTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified15 min - 1 hour
70.881 %
72.797 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:15 min - 1 hourTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 131,072 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vals IndexVibe Code Bench
42.523 %Higher measured value
32.804 %
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:1.2:vibe_code_benchTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-11-e79d08d59249Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlEnglish
1,451.541 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±5.021The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,482.119 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±5.43The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:englishTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GLM-5.1: Snapshot: glm-5.1, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.4 mini: Style-controlled Arena rating from 27,882 anonymous pairwise votes.GLM-5.1: Style-controlled Arena rating from 17,745 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis
65.294 %Higher measured value
56.958 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:earnings_analysisTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.4 mini: Snapshot: gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17, Reasoning: xhigh, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
GLM-5.1: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-11-3e5c93a1857cRetrieved 2026-08-11

The table shows 64 diversified result series from 115 shared results. This prevents one benchmark with many subtasks from crowding out every other test.

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

Prices use official API rates per 1M tokens. Web subscriptions and cloud platform surcharges can differ.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.