Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

GLM-5.3 vs. GLM-5.2

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
8
distinct benchmarks
8
latest retrieval
2026-08-26

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for GLM-5.3 and GLM-5.2
AttributeGLM-5.3GLM-5.2
ProviderZ.aiZ.ai
ReleasedAug 14, 2026Jun 16, 2026
AvailabilityActiveOpen Source
Model typeOpen WeightsOpen Weights
Parameters744B, 40B active744B, 40B active
ArchitectureMixture of ExpertsMixture of Experts
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoffNot publishedNot published
Technical sourcesModel, ContextModel, Context

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for GLM-5.3 and GLM-5.2
Price typeGLM-5.3GLM-5.2
API input$1.4$1.4
API output$4.4$4.4
Cache read$0.26$0.26
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified08/30/2026 Source07/30/2026 Source
GLM-5.3GLM-5.2
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GLM-5.3Tie$1.4
GLM-5.2Tie$1.4
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GLM-5.3Tie$4.4
GLM-5.2Tie$4.4
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GLM-5.3Tie$0.26
GLM-5.2Tie$0.26

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for GLM-5.3 and GLM-5.2
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
GLM-5.3Z.aiDirect from developerStandard API$1.4$4.4Source08/30/2026
AkashMLVia OpenRouterakashml/fp8$1.3$4.4Source08/29/2026
AtlasCloudVia OpenRouteratlas-cloud/fp8$1.26Lowest listed price: $3.96Source08/29/2026
BaseTenVia OpenRouterbaseten/fp4$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
CloudflareVia OpenRoutercloudflare$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
DeepInfraVia OpenRouterdeepinfra/fp8Lowest listed price: $1.2$4Source08/29/2026
DigitalOceanVia OpenRouterdigitalocean$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
FriendliVia OpenRouterfriendli$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
GMICloudVia OpenRoutergmicloud/fp8$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
Io NetVia OpenRouterio-net/fp8$1.25$4.4Source08/29/2026
ModalVia OpenRoutermodal$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
MorphVia OpenRoutermorph/fp4$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
NovitaVia OpenRouternovita/fp8$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
ParasailVia OpenRouterparasail/fp8$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
TogetherVia OpenRoutertogether$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
Z.AIVia OpenRouterz-ai/fp8$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
GLM-5.2Z.aiDirect from developerStandard API$1.4$4.4Source07/30/2026
AlibabaVia OpenRouteralibaba/fast$2.31$7.26Source08/29/2026
AlibabaVia OpenRouteralibaba/fp8$0.966$3.036Source08/29/2026
AmbientVia OpenRouterambient/fp8$0.6$2Source08/29/2026
AtlasCloudVia OpenRouteratlas-cloud/fp8$1.26$3.96Source08/29/2026
BaiduVia OpenRouterbaidu/fp8$0.3724$1.1704Source08/29/2026
BaseTenVia OpenRouterbaseten/fast$2.1$6.6Source08/29/2026
BaseTenVia OpenRouterbaseten/fp8$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
CloudflareVia OpenRoutercloudflare$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
CoreWeaveVia OpenRoutercoreweave/fp4$0.76$2.42Source08/29/2026
CrusoeVia OpenRoutercrusoe/fp8$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
DecartVia OpenRouterdecart/fp4$0.684$2.28Source08/29/2026
DeepInfraVia OpenRouterdeepinfra/fp4$0.4875$1.56Source08/29/2026
DigitalOceanVia OpenRouterdigitalocean$0.7$2.2Source08/29/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks/fast$2.1$6.6Source08/29/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks/fast-us$2.1$6.6Source08/29/2026
FriendliVia OpenRouterfriendli$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
GMICloudVia OpenRoutergmicloud/fp8$1.05$3.3Source08/29/2026
InceptronVia OpenRouterinceptron/fp4$0.71$2.35Source08/29/2026
MakoraVia OpenRoutermakora/fp4$0.72$2.38Source08/29/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral/eu$1.54$4.84Source08/29/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral/zdr$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
NovitaVia OpenRouternovita/fp8$0.3416$1.0736Source08/29/2026
ParasailVia OpenRouterparasail/fp4$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
PhalaVia OpenRouterphala/fp8$1.26$3Source08/29/2026
RekaVia OpenRouterreka/fp8$1.1$3.75Source08/29/2026
Sail ResearchVia OpenRoutersail-research/fp8$0.5$3.15Source08/29/2026
SiliconFlowVia OpenRoutersiliconflow/fp8$1.19$3.74Source08/29/2026
StreamLakeVia OpenRouterstreamlake/fp8Lowest listed price: $0.3276Lowest listed price: $1.0296Source08/29/2026
TogetherVia OpenRoutertogether$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
VeniceVia OpenRoutervenice/fp8$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026
Z.AIVia OpenRouterz-ai/fp8$1.4$4.4Source08/29/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

255075100CodingReasoningKnowledgeLegalAgentic tasks
GLM-5.3
GLM-5.2
Coding: 100 / 68.8 (3 benchmark families)
Reasoning: 100 / 97.1 (1 benchmark family)
Knowledge: 100 / 99.9 (1 benchmark family)
Legal: 100 / 99.1 (1 benchmark family)
Agentic tasks: 100 / 94.8 (2 benchmark families)

8 matched rows from 8 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 5 of 5 comparable categories.

GLM-5.3GLM-5.2
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GLM-5.3Winner88.132 %
GLM-5.285.606 %
LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GLM-5.3Winner84.837 %
GLM-5.284.073 %
LiveCodeBench v6Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GLM-5.3Winner80.535 %
GLM-5.269.5 %
MMLU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GLM-5.3Winner86.77 %
GLM-5.286.714 %
ProgramBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GLM-5.3Winner1.5 %
GLM-5.20.5 %
SkillsBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GLM-5.3Winner47.509 %
GLM-5.245.077 %
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GLM-5.3Winner95.4 %
GLM-5.282.8 %
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GLM-5.3Winner71.536 %
GLM-5.267.79 %

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for GLM-5.3 and GLM-5.2
Benchmark and taskGLM-5.3GLM-5.2Source
GPQA DiamondOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner88.132 %
85.606 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/19/2026
LegalBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner84.837 %
84.073 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/19/2026
LiveCodeBench v6Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner80.535 %
69.5 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/19/2026
MMLU-ProOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner86.77 %
86.714 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/19/2026
ProgramBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner1.5 %
0.5 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/19/2026
SkillsBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Harness: OpenHands
Winner47.509 %
45.077 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/19/2026
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner95.4 %
82.8 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/19/2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner71.536 %
67.79 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/19/2026

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare GLM-5.3 and GLM-5.2 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison