Gemini 4 Carbonvs.Muse Wonder Full
Which one is better?
Gemini 4 Carbon is clearly ahead in the overall index.
Gemini 4 Carbon
Rank 1 to 5
Muse Wonder Full
Rank 6 to 9
Gemini 4 Carbon
fairly fast
Muse Wonder Full
Gemini 4 Carbon
- Subscription
Subscriptions in Germany: n/a
- Via API
n/a (no API price known).
Muse Wonder Full
- Subscription
Not included in any subscription in Germany.
- Via API
n/a (no API price known).
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
Gemini 4 Carbon ahead: 3Muse Wonder Full ahead: 0level: 3too little data: 3of 9 areas
Show 2 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
Gemini 4 Carbon
Not tested yet
Muse Wonder Full
Not tested yet
Prompt and test conditions
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Task origin (Simon Willison)All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon | Muse Wonder Full |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 96 | 90 |
| Rank | Rank 1 to 5 of 95 | Rank 6 to 9 of 95 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | n/a | n/a |
| Outputwhat the model writes | n/a | n/a |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 100 | n/a |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | n/a | n/a |
| Released | n/a | Oct 12, 2026 |
| Availability | Limited access | Subscription only |
| Open weights | no | no |
- Gemini 4 Carbon, Announced introductory pricing: $2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens. Cached input receives a 95% discount, giving $0.10 per 1M tokens. This announcement does not establish an already available public API. Source
- Gemini 4 Carbon, Announced pricing after the introductory period: Afterward, $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens. Google has not specified when the introductory period ends. Source
- Gemini 4 Carbon, Artificial Analysis pricing assumptions: Artificial Analysis calculates test costs using $4 input, $20 output, and $0.20 cached input per 1M tokens. These are the evaluator’s pricing assumptions, not confirmation of a publicly available API tariff. Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Gemini 4 CarbonB: Muse Wonder Full
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Gemini 4 Carbon and Muse Wonder Full with other leading models.