- Home
- LLM comparison
- Gemini 4 Argon vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
Gemini 4 Argonvs.Qwen 3.8 27B
Which one is better?
Gemini 4 Argon is clearly ahead in the overall index, but costs 50 times (input) and 4 times (output) as much per token.
Gemini 4 Argon
Rank 2 to 7
Qwen 3.8 27B
Rank 44 to 57
Gemini 4 Argon
fairly slow
Qwen 3.8 27B
slow
Gemini 4 Argon
fairly expensive
Qwen 3.8 27B
fairly cheap
Gemini 4 Argon
- Subscription
At Google DeepMind from €21.99 a month (Google AI Pro, with limited credits). Through other providers from ≈ €6.36 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 28 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$2 input, $10 output per 1M tokens.
- Note
- There is a successor: Gemini 4 Carbon (rank 1 to 5).
Qwen 3.8 27B
- Subscription
No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €1.06 a month (Command Code Go, with limited credits). 10 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$0.04 input, $2.50 output per 1M tokens according to the provider; the price index has listed it at $0.42 and $3 since Oct 27, 2026.
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
Gemini 4 Argon ahead: 8Qwen 3.8 27B ahead: 0level: 0too little data: 2of 10 areas
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Shared test round: 43b8c5c46830
Gemini 4 Argon
Unavailable in this round
Qwen 3.8 27B

Test details
API reports 0 reasoning tokensAPI model: qwen/qwen3.8-27b865 output tokensEarlier tests
This is the lowest documented setting for each provider. It does not make compute comparable across models.
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
Gemini 4 Argon
Not tested yet
Qwen 3.8 27B
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Reasoning (requested): disabled (enabled: false)
Current attempt
- Run date
- Oct 11, 2026
- API provider
- Alibaba
- Requested API model
- qwen/qwen3.8-27b
- API model reported in response
- qwen/qwen3.8-27b
- Reasoning setting
- disabled (enabled: false)
- Pinned endpoint
- Alibaba | qwen/qwen3.8-27b-20260814
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Reasoning tokens
- 0
- Test protocol
- community-visual-low-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
- Response time
- 119.1 s
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Prompt and test conditions
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Task origin (Simon Willison)All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen 3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 93 | 11 |
| Rank | Rank 2 to 7 of 95 | Rank 44 to 57 of 95 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $2 | $0.04 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $10 | $2.50 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 82 | 40 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages | 262,144 tokens≈ 390 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | n/a | n/a |
| Released | Oct 13, 2026 | Aug 14, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | no | yes |
- Gemini 4 Argon, Standard pricing through November 30, 2026: Per 1 million tokens: $2.00 input, $10.00 output including thinking, and $0.10 cached input. Source
- Gemini 4 Argon, Standard pricing from December 1, 2026: Per 1 million tokens: $4.00 input, $20.00 output including thinking, and $0.20 cached input. Source
- Gemini 4 Argon, Caching: Implicit caching only; explicit caching is not supported. Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Gemini 4 ArgonB: Qwen 3.8 27B
Show 54 more benchmarks
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen 3.8 27B with other leading models.