Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.
shared result series
146
distinct benchmarks
23
latest retrieval
2026-09-04
Change model selection
Specifications
General specifications
Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.
The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
Pricing by provider
Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.
Provider pricing for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.
Capability profile from matched benchmarks
Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
MiMo-V2.5
Coding: 100 / 80.7 (4 benchmark families)
Reasoning: 100 / 88 (1 benchmark family)
Mathematics: 100 / 51.6 (1 benchmark family)
Knowledge: 100 / 92.6 (1 benchmark family)
Finance: 100 / 85.3 (5 benchmark families)
Legal: 100 / 63.6 (3 benchmark families)
Agentic tasks: 100 / 81.8 (1 benchmark family)
Multimodal: 100 / 90.6 (1 benchmark family)
24 matched rows from 22 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 8 of 11 comparable categories.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner26.745 %
MiMo-V2.514.228 %
CorpFin v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner64.686 %
MiMo-V2.559.907 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner63.548 %
MiMo-V2.555.092 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner57.861 %
MiMo-V2.536.728 %
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner92.676 %
MiMo-V2.581.566 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner2.5 %
MiMo-V2.51.667 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner30.769 %
MiMo-V2.59.135 %
LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner83.602 %
MiMo-V2.578.886 %
LiveCodeBench v6Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner87.604 %
MiMo-V2.581.512 %
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Gemini 3.5 FlashHigher measured value1,479.148
MiMo-V2.51,433.798
MedCodeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner55.825 %
MiMo-V2.531.895 %
MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Gemini 3.5 FlashWinner76.574 %
MiMo-V2.572.151 %
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
Benchmark scores for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5
Benchmark and task
Gemini 3.5 Flash
MiMo-V2.5
Source
Code MigrationOverallTest details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGemini 3.5 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.5-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control MiMo-V2.5: Snapshot: mimo-v2.5, Harness: Arena text, style controlGemini 3.5 Flash: Style-controlled Arena rating from 33,874 anonymous pairwise votes.MiMo-V2.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 44,540 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,479.148
95% confidence interval: ±4.345The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,433.798
95% confidence interval: ±4.342The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGemini 3.5 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.5-flash-medium, Reasoning: medium, Harness: Arena text, style control MiMo-V2.5: Snapshot: mimo-v2.5, Harness: Arena text, style controlGemini 3.5 Flash: Style-controlled Arena rating from 32,274 anonymous pairwise votes.MiMo-V2.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 44,540 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,474.438
95% confidence interval: ±4.676The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,433.798
95% confidence interval: ±4.342The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and financeTest details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGemini 3.5 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.5-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control MiMo-V2.5: Snapshot: mimo-v2.5, Harness: Arena text, style controlGemini 3.5 Flash: Style-controlled Arena rating from 6,750 anonymous pairwise votes.MiMo-V2.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 9,127 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,465.666
95% confidence interval: ±7.938The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,441.542
95% confidence interval: ±7.42The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and financeTest details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGemini 3.5 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.5-flash-medium, Reasoning: medium, Harness: Arena text, style control MiMo-V2.5: Snapshot: mimo-v2.5, Harness: Arena text, style controlGemini 3.5 Flash: Style-controlled Arena rating from 6,429 anonymous pairwise votes.MiMo-V2.5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 9,127 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,460.515
95% confidence interval: ±8.197The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,441.542
95% confidence interval: ±7.42The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
Our model tests
Community tests you can inspect
Compare how the models respond to the same prompt. Each test shows the first attempt, with no subsequent fixes to the generated code. These results do not contribute to an overall score.
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
Gemini 3.5 Flash
API access was unavailable for this run. The model was not evaluated.
First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.5-flash
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.5-flash-20260519
Reasoning setting
high
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Not run
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
MiMo-V2.5
API access was unavailable for this run. The model was not evaluated.
First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
xiaomi/mimo-v2.5
Pinned endpoint
Xiaomi | xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-20260422
Reasoning setting
high
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Not run
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.
The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.
Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.