Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Mythos 5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
0
distinct benchmark metrics
0
latest retrieval
No data

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Claude Mythos 5 and Gemini 4 Argon
AttributeClaude Mythos 5Gemini 4 Argon
ProviderAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Oct 13, 2026
AvailabilityLimited accessActive
Model typeProprietaryProprietary
ParametersNot publishedNot published
ArchitectureNot publishedNot published
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens shared across input, thinking, and output
Knowledge cutoffJanuary 2026Not published
Technical sourcesModel, Context, Knowledge cutoffModel

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Claude Mythos 5 and Gemini 4 Argon
Price typeClaude Mythos 5Gemini 4 Argon
API input$10$2
API output$50$10
Cache read$1$0.1
Cache write (5 min.)$12.5Not listed
Cache write (1 hr.)$20Not listed
Price verified09/22/2026 Source10/25/2026 Source

Gemini 4 Argon, Standard pricing through November 30, 2026

Per 1 million tokens: $2.00 input, $10.00 output including thinking, and $0.10 cached input. Source

Gemini 4 Argon, Standard pricing from December 1, 2026

Per 1 million tokens: $4.00 input, $20.00 output including thinking, and $0.20 cached input. Source

Gemini 4 Argon, Caching

Implicit caching only; explicit caching is not supported. Source

Claude Mythos 5Gemini 4 Argon
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Mythos 5$10
Gemini 4 ArgonLower price$2
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Mythos 5$50
Gemini 4 ArgonLower price$10
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Mythos 5$1
Gemini 4 ArgonLower price$0.1

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

No provider tariff for Claude Mythos 5 is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.

No provider tariff for Gemini 4 Argon is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.

Provider pricing for Claude Mythos 5 and Gemini 4 Argon
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Claude Mythos 5AnthropicDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $10Lowest listed price: $50Source09/22/2026
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle DeepMindDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $2Lowest listed price: $10Source10/25/2026

Benchmark index

Benchmark index compared

The index combines independent benchmarks on a scale from 0 to 100. A lead only counts when a model comes first in at least 95% of 200 recalculations with randomly redrawn test families. Otherwise both count as level.

Open the AI leaderboard

Overall index

No overall score yet

Overall index

92.6

The two models do not yet share an area with a score each.

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

Not enough directly matched categories for a reliable radar

Only 0 of at least 5 categories have comparable, direct model measurements. The benchmark tables below show the available evidence without filling missing axes.

No directly comparable result series yet

No published benchmark for Claude Mythos 5 and Gemini 4 Argon currently matches in version, task, metric, and comparison cohort. We therefore show no estimated or blended values.

Our model tests

Our tests

SVG short test

One SVG prompt and fixed output settings. Captures are shown only with 0 reported reasoning tokens or documented lack of reasoning controls. Identical test conditions do not make the models' internal compute identical.

Shared test round: 43b8c5c46830

Claude Mythos 5

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 4 Argon

Unavailable in this round

Earlier tests

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Claude Mythos 5

No available test access

Current attempt
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Not run

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Gemini 4 Argon

Not tested yet

Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Claude Mythos 5 and Gemini 4 Argon with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison