Skip to main content

AlibabaVideo model matchup

Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3Bvs.EasyAnimate V5.1 T2V 12B

Neither Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3B nor EasyAnimate V5.1 T2V 12B has an LMArena rating yet.

about as long
Longest clipSeconds per request
5 s

Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3B

6 s

EasyAnimate V5.1 T2V 12B

Where is the difference?

Longest clipabout as long5 s to 6 s

Bar length shows the gap: for ratings full width from 60 points, for price from four times as much, for clip length from 20 seconds. Solid means clearly ahead, hatched slightly ahead, a thin grey bar level.

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

MetricWan 2.1 T2V 1.3BEasyAnimate V5.1 T2V 12B
Output
Resolution480p1024x1024
Longest clip5 s6 s
Soundgenerated by the modeln/ano
Access
Weightsopenopen
Parameters1.3B12B
Routeslocallocal
ReleasedFeb 25, 2025Jan 21, 2025
Statusavailableavailable

Prices: public API price of the documented standard configuration; resolution and sound can change it

Is there a better choice?

Best model for text to videoGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Text to video 1,516, Place 1 of 23. $0.51 per 5 s clip.

Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3B vs. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Sources and method

Show 2 sources and the method

Ratings come from the LMArena: people see two videos for the same prompt without knowing which model made them and pick the better one. Many such picks add up to a rating, higher is better. Text to video and image to video are separate lists and are never added together.

“Ahead” means one model stays clearly higher even with the rating’s uncertainty. “Slightly ahead” means its value is higher but the gap is not certain yet. Otherwise both count as level. Places count only the models of our comparison.

Prices and clip lengths come from the providers’ documentation. From a factor of 1.25 a model counts as cheaper or longer, below that as about the same.

Compare another matchup