StepFunAlibabaVideo model matchup
Step-Video-T2V Turbovs.Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p
Neither Step-Video-T2V Turbo nor Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p has an LMArena rating yet.
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Step-Video-T2V Turbo | Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p |
|---|---|---|
| Output | ||
| Resolution | n/a | 384p |
| Soundgenerated by the model | n/a | no |
| Access | ||
| Weights | open | open |
| Parameters | 30B | 3B |
| Routes | local | local |
| Released | n/a | March 2026 |
| Status | available | available |
Prices: public API price of the documented standard configuration; resolution and sound can change it
Is there a better choice?
Text to video 1,516, Place 1 of 23. $0.51 per 5 s clip.
Step-Video-T2V Turbo vs. Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashSources and method
Show 2 sources and the method
Ratings come from the LMArena: people see two videos for the same prompt without knowing which model made them and pick the better one. Many such picks add up to a rating, higher is better. Text to video and image to video are separate lists and are never added together.
“Ahead” means one model stays clearly higher even with the rating’s uncertainty. “Slightly ahead” means its value is higher but the gap is not certain yet. Otherwise both count as level. Places count only the models of our comparison.
Prices and clip lengths come from the providers’ documentation. From a factor of 1.25 a model counts as cheaper or longer, below that as about the same.
- Step-Video-T2V Turbo, specifications, checked Nov 1, 2026
- Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p, specifications, checked Nov 1, 2026
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related video model comparisons
Compare Step-Video-T2V Turbo and Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p with other important video models.