ByteDanceAlibabaVideo model matchup
Seedance 2.0 Fastvs.Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p
Neither Seedance 2.0 Fast nor Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p has an LMArena rating yet.
Choose Seedance 2.0 Fast for
No clear advantage
Choose Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p for
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Seedance 2.0 Fast | Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p |
|---|---|---|
| Output | ||
| Resolution | n/a | 384p |
| Soundgenerated by the model | n/a | no |
| Access | ||
| Weights | n/a | open |
| Parameters | n/a | 3B |
| Routes | API | local |
| Released | n/a | March 2026 |
| Status | available | available |
Prices: public API price of the documented standard configuration; resolution and sound can change it
Is there a better choice?
Text to video 1,516, Place 1 of 23. $0.51 per 5 s clip.
Seedance 2.0 Fast vs. Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashSources and method
Show 2 sources and the method
Ratings come from the LMArena: people see two videos for the same prompt without knowing which model made them and pick the better one. Many such picks add up to a rating, higher is better. Text to video and image to video are separate lists and are never added together.
“Ahead” means one model stays clearly higher even with the rating’s uncertainty. “Slightly ahead” means its value is higher but the gap is not certain yet. Otherwise both count as level. Places count only the models of our comparison.
Prices and clip lengths come from the providers’ documentation. From a factor of 1.25 a model counts as cheaper or longer, below that as about the same.
- Seedance 2.0 Fast, specifications, checked Nov 1, 2026
- Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p, specifications, checked Nov 1, 2026
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related video model comparisons
Compare Seedance 2.0 Fast and Lumos-1 3B SFT 384p with other important video models.