Skip to main content

KuaishouShengShu TechnologyVideo model matchup

Kling 3.0 Provs.Vidu Q1

Vidu Q1 has no LMArena rating yet.

Image to videoLMArena rating
1,354

Kling 3.0 Pro

Place 13 of 21

n/a

Vidu Q1

Price per 5 s clipUS dollars per clip
$0.84

Kling 3.0 Pro

n/a

Vidu Q1

Kling 3.0 Pro longer
Longest clipSeconds per request
15 s

Kling 3.0 Pro

5 s

Vidu Q1

Choose Kling 3.0 Pro for

long clips

Choose Vidu Q1 for

No clear advantage

Same prompt, both models

The first clip from a single request each, showing the first five seconds.

What to look for: Anatomy, object consistency, camera tracking, rain, and reflections. Sound muted, as the test protocol requires.

Kling 3.0 Pro

Run details

fal.ai. fal-ai/kling-video/v3/pro/text-to-video. 16:9, one request, first output, requested 5 s, seed provider random, request {"prompt":"Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.","duration":"5","aspect_ratio":"16:9","generate_audio":false}, configured price estimate $0.56.

Generated Aug 24, 2026. Source

Vidu Q1

No clip: this task has not yet been tested for the model.

Show the prompt given to both models

Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.

Where is the difference?

Image to videoNo rating for Vidu Q1
Price per 5 s clipNo price for Vidu Q1
Longest clipKling 3.0 Pro longer15 s to 5 s
ResolutionKling 3.0 Pro higher4K to 1080p
Soundboth with sound

Bar length shows the gap: for ratings full width from 60 points, for price from four times as much, for clip length from 20 seconds. Solid means clearly ahead, hatched slightly ahead, a thin grey bar level.

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

MetricKling 3.0 ProVidu Q1
Performance
Image to videoLMArena rating1,354Place 13 of 21n/a
Cost
Price per second$0.17n/a
Price per 5 s clip$0.84n/a
Output
Resolution4K1080p
Longest clip15 s5 s
Soundgenerated by the modelyesyes
Access
Weightsproprietaryn/a
RoutesAPI, webAPI
ReleasedFebruary 2026n/a
Statusavailableavailable

Prices: public API price of the documented standard configuration; resolution and sound can change it

Kling 3.0 Pro and Vidu Q1 in the field

Every video model of our comparison with a rating, both models of this matchup highlighted.

Image to video

Rating from anonymous comparisons in the LMArena · higher is better

MiniMax H31,495
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash1,488
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p1,477
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p1,475
Gemini Omni Flash1,465
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,456
FLUX.3 Video1,449
Wan 2.71,428
Grok Imagine Video1,415
Veo 3.11,398
Veo 3.1 Fast1,385
Vidu Q3 Pro1,363
Kling 3.0 Pro1,354
Wan 2.61,310
PixVerse V5.61,299
Kling 2.6 Pro1,294
Hailuo 2.31,262
HunyuanVideo 1.51,198
Wan 2.2 A14B1,170
LTX-2 19B1,159
Pika 2.2997

As of September 22, 2026 · Source: LMArena

Is there a better choice?

Best model for text to videoGemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Text to video 1,516, Place 1 of 23. $0.51 per 5 s clip.

Kling 3.0 Pro vs. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Sources and method

Show 4 sources and the method

Ratings come from the LMArena: people see two videos for the same prompt without knowing which model made them and pick the better one. Many such picks add up to a rating, higher is better. Text to video and image to video are separate lists and are never added together.

“Ahead” means one model stays clearly higher even with the rating’s uncertainty. “Slightly ahead” means its value is higher but the gap is not certain yet. Otherwise both count as level. Places count only the models of our comparison.

Prices and clip lengths come from the providers’ documentation. From a factor of 1.25 a model counts as cheaper or longer, below that as about the same.

Compare another matchup