Skip to main content

Direct comparison

Kling 3.0 Pro vs. LTX-2 19B

Compare the exact model versions across shared blind-preference benchmarks, public pricing, release dates, resolution, duration, native audio, access, and model availability.

Overview

Technical specifications and pricing

Technical limits come from model or API documentation. A representative minute price appears only when it can be traced to the exact model. Different resolutions and audio settings may still affect the final charge.

Specifications and pricing for Kling 3.0 Pro and LTX-2 19B
AttributeKling 3.0 ProLTX-2 19B
ProviderKuaishouLightricks
ReleasedFebruary 2026October 2025
AccessAPI, Web appAPI, Web app, Local
WeightsProprietaryOpen weights
ParametersNot published19 billion
Maximum resolution1080pNot published
Maximum duration15 sNot published
Native audioYesYes
Representative API price$20.16 per minute SourceNot published
LifecycleNo separate noticeNo separate notice
Technical sourceModel sourceVerified 2026-08-24Model sourceVerified 2026-08-24

Performance

Shared video benchmarks

A row appears only when both exact model versions occur in the same LMArena task and stored dataset revision. Text-to-video and image-to-video are never merged into one score.

Kling 3.0 ProLTX-2 19B
LMArena Image to VideoBlind preference rating from the same task and dataset revision
Kling 3.0 ProHigher value1,356
LTX-2 19B1,154

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Shared video benchmarks for Kling 3.0 Pro and LTX-2 19B
BenchmarkKling 3.0 ProLTX-2 19BSource
LMArena Image to Video
Higher rating1,356Rank 16, 95% interval 1,349.9 to 1,362.2, 168,760 votes
1,154Rank 42, 95% interval 1,148.7 to 1,159.2, 223,241 votes
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26

Higher rating is better. A clear lead is shown only when the published 95% intervals do not overlap.

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Visual comparison

Sample videos

Only runs from both exact model versions under the same archived prompt and first-output rule appear here. Provider showcases and substitute versions remain excluded.

Controlled practical comparison. Both exact model versions received the same archived prompt in one request. The first output counts. Playback uses the first five seconds, 1280 × 720 pixels, 30 fps, no crop, and muted audio. Provider-side randomness and prompt processing remain model characteristics.

Motion and physical consistency

Anatomy, object consistency, camera tracking, rain, and reflections

Kling 3.0 Pro

Run details

fal.ai. fal-ai/kling-video/v3/pro/text-to-video. 16:9, one request, first output, requested 5 s, seed provider random, request {"prompt":"Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.","duration":"5","aspect_ratio":"16:9","generate_audio":false}, configured price estimate $0.56.

Generated Aug 24, 2026. Source

LTX-2 19B

Run details

fal.ai. fal-ai/ltx-2-19b/text-to-video. 16:9, one request, first output, requested 5 s, seed 1843750023, request {"prompt":"Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.","video_size":"landscape_16_9","num_frames":121,"fps":24,"generate_audio":false,"use_multiscale":true,"camera_lora":"none","acceleration":"regular","guidance_scale":3,"num_inference_steps":40,"enable_prompt_expansion":false,"enable_safety_checker":true,"video_output_type":"X264 (.mp4)","video_quality":"high","video_write_mode":"balanced"}, configured price estimate $0.25.

Generated Aug 24, 2026. Source

Prompt and integrity hashes

Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.

Prompt SHA 256: 206a9182584e93790fd6df608e8a2065fe2c8f747e85aeaaf4c8ea84040e6299

Kling 3.0 Pro, Original SHA 256: 7a1c60e977723e65c4ecfdf4141a8aa975fdbdc6c9419cdfa80cb9bd5298f994

Kling 3.0 Pro, Normalized SHA 256: 861365032c78e4fd964c91f62d1e0ba0792118beaa1f334f016cd29337a25c9b

LTX-2 19B, Original SHA 256: 50e1b2b965e454d2b281c824e51c37f67e77180db2666fe867f468cdd1915dec

LTX-2 19B, Normalized SHA 256: 6e14e70363b037fb264d594ea3b9bf8af38d28b3e4f17bf1ed6c86be8ef22229

How to read the data

Preference is not the same as production fit

A higher LMArena rating means that outputs from this exact configuration were preferred more often in blind comparisons.

Motion control, identity consistency, audio, turnaround time, moderation, and licensing may matter more than the aggregate preference rating.

Prices are representative public minute rates, not a normalized cost benchmark.

More matchups

Compare Kling 3.0 Pro and LTX-2 19B with other important video models using the same benchmark logic.

View the complete video model comparison