Gemini Omni Flash
Run details
Google Workspace Gemini Pro. Gemini Omni Flash. 16:9 landscape, one request, first output for canonical prompt, requested 5 s, Gemini Pro video mode, no seed control.
Generated Aug 24, 2026. Source
Direct comparison
Gemini Omni Flash vs. Pika 2.2
Compare the exact model versions across shared blind-preference benchmarks, public pricing, release dates, resolution, duration, native audio, access, and model availability.
Overview
Technical specifications and pricing
Technical limits come from model or API documentation. A representative minute price appears only when it can be traced to the exact model. Different resolutions and audio settings may still affect the final charge.
| Attribute | Gemini Omni Flash | Pika 2.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Pika | |
| Released | June 2026 | February 2025 |
| Access | API, Web app | API, Web app |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Parameters | Not published | Not published |
| Maximum resolution | 720p | Not published |
| Maximum duration | 10 s | Not published |
| Native audio | Yes | Not published |
| Representative API price | $6 per minute Source | Not published |
| Lifecycle | No separate notice | No separate notice |
| Technical source | Model sourceVerified 2026-08-24 | Model sourceVerified 2026-08-24 |
Performance
Shared video benchmarks
A row appears only when both exact model versions occur in the same LMArena task and stored dataset revision. Text-to-video and image-to-video are never merged into one score.
Gemini Omni FlashPika 2.2
LMArena Text to VideoBlind preference rating from the same task and dataset revision
Gemini Omni FlashHigher value1,511.6
Pika 2.21,007.7
LMArena Image to VideoBlind preference rating from the same task and dataset revision
Gemini Omni FlashHigher value1,462.2
Pika 2.2995.9
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
| Benchmark | Gemini Omni Flash | Pika 2.2 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text to Video | Higher rating1,511.6Rank 1, 95% interval 1,500.9 to 1,522.3, 16,916 votes | 1,007.7Rank 44, 95% interval 992.4 to 1,023, 5,746 votes | LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26 |
| LMArena Image to Video | Higher rating1,462.2Rank 4, 95% interval 1,455.7 to 1,468.7, 54,179 votes | 995.9Rank 45, 95% interval 982.4 to 1,009.5, 8,665 votes | LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26 |
Higher rating is better. A clear lead is shown only when the published 95% intervals do not overlap.
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
Visual comparison
Sample videos
Only runs from both exact model versions under the same archived prompt and first-output rule appear here. Provider showcases and substitute versions remain excluded.
Controlled practical comparison. Both exact model versions received the same archived prompt in one request. The first output counts. Playback uses the first five seconds, 1280 × 720 pixels, 30 fps, no crop, and muted audio. Provider-side randomness and prompt processing remain model characteristics.
Motion and physical consistency
Anatomy, object consistency, camera tracking, rain, and reflections
Pika 2.2
Run details
fal.ai. fal-ai/pika/v2.2/text-to-video. 16:9, one request, first output, requested 5 s, seed provider random, request {"prompt":"Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.","aspect_ratio":"16:9","resolution":"720p","duration":5}, configured price estimate $0.20.
Generated Aug 24, 2026. Source
Prompt and integrity hashes
Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.
Prompt SHA 256: 206a9182584e93790fd6df608e8a2065fe2c8f747e85aeaaf4c8ea84040e6299
Gemini Omni Flash, Original SHA 256: 76b572f5e68e4e8c765c3776abe1e3a1873b3767b93bdd807c94fbd53d67db27
Gemini Omni Flash, Normalized SHA 256: 47c299ce2e703a831cb007f97076bc859675eba5ad09a7a42a9f4dfbb32256d4
Pika 2.2, Original SHA 256: 6e559c3845b8d1cca1779f52f558e1455283bd73584f4c3869098006d80ace0e
Pika 2.2, Normalized SHA 256: 21bbf477684d886ab183062fd059fcc4d4acbc45f846496c998aea542ae0e8cb
How to read the data
Preference is not the same as production fit
A higher LMArena rating means that outputs from this exact configuration were preferred more often in blind comparisons.
Motion control, identity consistency, audio, turnaround time, moderation, and licensing may matter more than the aggregate preference rating.
Prices are representative public minute rates, not a normalized cost benchmark.
More matchups
Related video model comparisons
Compare Gemini Omni Flash and Pika 2.2 with other important video models using the same benchmark logic.