Z-Image Turbovs.Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

Which one is better?

In our own test, Z-Image Turbo leads. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

Z-Image Turbo: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run — Z-Image Turbo54 out of 100

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run — Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px2 out of 100

Result for “Typography and layout”:Z-Image Turbo ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Z-Image Turbo: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=457367499, prompt expansion disabled, estimated cost $0.010000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:35 PM. Source

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one image, provider-side randomize seed enabled, observed seed 1646387073, native 1024x1024, 2 inference steps, guidance 4.5, no prompt enhancement, no reference images, exact checkpoint Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_Sprint_0.6B_1024px_diffusers, Space commit b42328123ed688df4bee46e52c60cc1dc62c045a, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Z-Image Turbo image SHA 256: 5297796931ae8a9259947d2ee85881444a6408266aa7c9bc45d365b56bd11fe1

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px image SHA 256: 17356f29ad7fa9644e9683ec624d0c01ad56ff0c14d078db5f78f3b6bcf6a45e

Infographic

Z-Image Turbo: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=364147116, prompt expansion disabled, estimated cost $0.010000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:35 PM. Source

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one image, provider-side randomize seed enabled, observed seed 1798448399, native 1024x1024, 2 inference steps, guidance 4.5, no prompt enhancement, no reference images, exact checkpoint Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_Sprint_0.6B_1024px_diffusers, Space commit b42328123ed688df4bee46e52c60cc1dc62c045a, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Z-Image Turbo image SHA 256: 2a0bbce06ee9f7e009876b2d9abc02657f7be5535cd79ab7f37df0bf61b141a8

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px image SHA 256: efbab43ef1980109bff4084afe6162c4915e4fb55185617adaac5713f20b5e24

Product photography

Z-Image Turbo: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=453185405, prompt expansion disabled, estimated cost $0.010000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:35 PM. Source

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one image, provider-side randomize seed enabled, observed seed 520567323, native 1024x1024, 2 inference steps, guidance 4.5, no prompt enhancement, no reference images, exact checkpoint Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_Sprint_0.6B_1024px_diffusers, Space commit b42328123ed688df4bee46e52c60cc1dc62c045a, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Z-Image Turbo image SHA 256: 16330b5b71c71290aaa2994dd589e5e2088712d286fddcee8046e56c300f124e

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px image SHA 256: ac2d880a5b40924b518e25c61c5e077ffc9c5825f3eb896d733096ac6c631e46

Typography and layout

Z-Image Turbo: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=249593273, prompt expansion disabled, estimated cost $0.010000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:35 PM. Source

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one image, provider-side randomize seed enabled, observed seed 1229099615, native 1024x1024, 2 inference steps, guidance 4.5, no prompt enhancement, no reference images, exact checkpoint Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_Sprint_0.6B_1024px_diffusers, Space commit b42328123ed688df4bee46e52c60cc1dc62c045a, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Z-Image Turbo image SHA 256: 0a9ee8166b04fc677b96ca3f74d8fcf37657d812f81d3b94940092aa661dba50

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px image SHA 256: fd10095819c7746d6b52cc50e3d63f9d81eff271ad1edb4d3ba667a954098ac7

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better

n/a

Z-Image Turbo

not in the arena

n/a

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better

Z-Image Turbo

Rank 54 of 74

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

Rank 73 of 74

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better

n/a

Z-Image Turbo

no API price

n/a

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

no API price

Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

Z-Image Turbo

Subscription: No Tongyi-MAI / Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €12.78 a month (Recraft Basic, with limited credits). 3 plans in Germany.
Via API: No API price known. Access: API, local, Web app.
License: Open weights.

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

Subscription: n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API: No API price known. Access: local.
License: Open weights.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

Kennzahl	Z-Image Turbo	Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better	n/a	n/a
Arena rank	n/a	n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating	n/a	n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100	37	5
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition	54	2
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details	28	8
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency	46	6
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization	21	4
API price
Per imagelower is better	n/a	n/a
100 images	n/a	n/a
Profile
Released	Nov 26, 2025	Mar 22, 2025
Weightsopen means: runs locally	open	open
Access	API, local, Web app	local
Parameters	not published	0.6 billion
Largest output	2K	not consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model	3	n/a

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: Z-Image Turbo model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Z-Image Turbo and Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

Compare another matchup

First image modelSecond image model

More matchups

Compare Z-Image Turbo and Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px with other important image models.

View the complete image model comparison

Same prompt, two images

The numbers at a glance

Z-Image Turbo

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

All data side by side

Arena ratings by category

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

Compare another matchup

Related image model comparisons