Z-Image Turbovs.FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview
Which one is better?
We have not tested FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview ourselves yet. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.
Same prompt, two images
Same task, the first image of each.
No image from the four fixed tasks for FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview yet.This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only Z-Image Turbo tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Missing image run for FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview
This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run. Run the missing fixed tasks, archive the first output of each, and evaluate them blind.
DocumentationThe numbers at a glance
Z-Image Turbo
not in the arena
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview
not in the arena
Z-Image Turbo
Rank 54 of 74
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview
not tested yet
Z-Image Turbo
no API price
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview
no API price
Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Z-Image Turbo
- Subscription
- No Tongyi-MAI / Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €12.78 a month (Recraft Basic, with limited credits). 3 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: API, local, Web app.
- License
- Open weights.
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: API.
- Weights
- unknown.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Z-Image Turbo | FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | n/a |
| Arena rank | n/a | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 37 | n/a |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 54 | n/a |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 28 | n/a |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 46 | n/a |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 21 | n/a |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | Nov 26, 2025 | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | open | unknown |
| Lifecycle | no notice | Preview API route with newer quality/speed improvements; the stable 9B route remains separate |
| Access | API, local, Web app | API |
| Parameters | not published | 9 billion |
| Largest output | 2K | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 3 | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Z-Image Turbo model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview model source, status source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Z-Image Turbo and FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related image model comparisons
Compare Z-Image Turbo and FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview with other important image models.