Reve 2.1vs.WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash
Which one is better?
We have not tested WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash ourselves yet. WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash has no arena rating yet. Neither has an API price.
Same prompt, two images
Same task, the first image of each.
No image from the four fixed tasks for WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash yet.This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only Reve 2.1 tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Missing image run for WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash
This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run. Run the missing fixed tasks, archive the first output of each, and evaluate them blind.
DocumentationThe numbers at a glance
Reve 2.1
Rank 6 of 22
WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash
not in the arena
Reve 2.1
Rank 21 of 74
WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash
not tested yet
Reve 2.1
no API price
WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash
no API price
Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Reve 2.1
- Subscription
- No Reve subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €12.78 a month (Recraft Basic, with limited credits). 3 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: .
WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: API.
- Weights
- unknown.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Reve 2.1 | WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | 1,300 | n/a |
| Arena rank | Rank 6 of 22 | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | 8,243 | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 63 | n/a |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 53 | n/a |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 67 | n/a |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 42 | n/a |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 90 | n/a |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | July 2026 | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | proprietary | unknown |
| Lifecycle | Retired; no new image or video generation after September 27, 2026. Existing assets can be downloaded until October 31, 2026 | no notice |
| Access | API | |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 4K | 4K |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 3 | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Reve 2.1 model source, status source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Reve 2.1 and WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related image model comparisons
Compare Reve 2.1 and WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash with other important image models.