AlibabaStability AIImage model matchup
Qwen Image 3.0vs.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash
Which one is better?
We have not tested Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash ourselves yet. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.
Qwen Image 3.0
Rank 26 of 108
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash
not tested yet
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench Image v2 run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Test images from GraduallyBench Image v2
Same task, the first image of each.
No image from the four fixed tasks for Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash yet.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only Qwen Image 3.0 tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: the 95 % ranges of both values do not overlap. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but the ranges overlap.
Missing image run for Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash
The password for our existing Stability AI account was unavailable. We could not test this model version without signing in. Last checked November 2, 2026. Resolve access to the existing account and check the available allowance for this model.
DocumentationSubscription and API
Qwen Image 3.0
- Subscription
- No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €16 a month (Magnific Premium, with limited credits). 6 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: API, Web app).
- Weights
- Unknown.
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: API).
- Weights
- Unknown.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
GraduallyBench Image v2 from Nov 7, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (43 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Qwen Image 3.0 | Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | n/a |
| Arena rank | n/a | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | n/a |
| GraduallyBench Image v2our own benchmark, 0 to 100 | 72 | n/a |
| GraduallyBench Image v2 by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 37 | n/a |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 93 | n/a |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 68 | n/a |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 91 | n/a |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | n/a | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | unknown | unknown |
| Access | API, Web app | API |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 2K | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 6 | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Qwen Image 3.0 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on Artificial Analysis and LMArena; the sources are named under the card. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen Image 3.0 and Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
More comparisons
Compare Qwen Image 3.0 and Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash with the models people compare them with most often.