AlibabaCircleStone Labs and Comfy OrgImage model matchup
Qwen Image 3.0vs.Anima Base v1.0
Which one is better?
We have not tested Anima Base v1.0 ourselves yet. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.
Qwen Image 3.0
Rank 26 of 108
Anima Base v1.0
not tested yet
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Test images from GraduallyBench
Same task, the first image of each.
No image from the four fixed tasks for Anima Base v1.0 yet.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only Qwen Image 3.0 tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: the 95 % ranges of both values do not overlap. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but the ranges overlap.
Missing image run for Anima Base v1.0
The demo reported an exhausted daily ZeroGPU allowance. The open weights use a noncommercial model license; permission for local testing whose results would be published on this commercially operated website remains unresolved. Last checked November 2, 2026. Resolve permission for this benchmark and access with sufficient allowance.
DocumentationSubscription and API
Qwen Image 3.0
- Subscription
- No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €16 a month (Magnific Premium, with limited credits). 6 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: API, Web app).
- Weights
- Unknown.
Anima Base v1.0
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: local).
- Weights
- Open weights.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
GraduallyBench from Nov 7, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (40 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Qwen Image 3.0 | Anima Base v1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | n/a |
| Arena rank | n/a | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own benchmark, 0 to 100 | 72 | n/a |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 37 | n/a |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 93 | n/a |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 68 | n/a |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 91 | n/a |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | n/a | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | unknown | open |
| Access | API, Web app | local |
| Parameters | not published | 2 billion |
| Largest output | 2K | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 6 | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Qwen Image 3.0 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · Anima Base v1.0 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on Artificial Analysis and LMArena; the sources are named under the card. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen Image 3.0 and Anima Base v1.0 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.