- Home
- Image model comparison
- Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. Stable Image Ultra
Qwen-Image-2.1vs.Stable Image Ultra
Which one is better?
We have not tested Stable Image Ultra ourselves yet. Stable Image Ultra has no arena rating yet. Neither has an API price.
Test images
Same task, the first image of each.

No image from the four fixed tasks for Stable Image Ultra yet.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only Qwen-Image-2.1 tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: the 95 % ranges of both values do not overlap. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but the ranges overlap.
Missing image run for Stable Image Ultra
The password for our existing Stability AI account was unavailable. We could not test this model version without signing in. Last checked November 2, 2026. Resolve access to the existing account and check the available allowance for this model.
DocumentationThe numbers at a glance
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 14 of 21
Stable Image Ultra
not in the arena
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 22 of 108
Stable Image Ultra
not tested yet
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Qwen-Image-2.1
- Subscription
- No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from $9 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 5 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: local, Web app).
- Weights
- Open weights, Qwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license.
Stable Image Ultra
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: API).
- Weights
- Unknown.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Nov 7, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 7, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (39 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Qwen-Image-2.1 | Stable Image Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | 1,227 | n/a |
| Arena rank | Rank 14 of 21 | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | 19,390 | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 74 | n/a |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 70 | n/a |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 87 | n/a |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 68 | n/a |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 70 | n/a |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | Sep 20, 2026 | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | openQwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license | unknown |
| Lifecycle | no notice | Current API generation service based on Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large, not an independent checkpoint |
| Access | local, Web app | API |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 2K | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 5 | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Qwen-Image-2.1 model source, status source (verified Sep 22, 2026) · Stable Image Ultra model source, status source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on Artificial Analysis and LMArena; the sources are named under the card. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen-Image-2.1 and Stable Image Ultra from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
More comparisons
Compare Qwen-Image-2.1 and Stable Image Ultra with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
The most popular comparisons
- 1Krea 2 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 2Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 3FLUX.2 Klein 9B vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 4FLUX.2 Flex vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 5FLUX.2 Max vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 6Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 7Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 8GPT Image 2 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 9Nano Banana Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
Show all 17 comparisons
- 10Nano Banana 2 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 11GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 12HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 13Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
- 14FLUX.2 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 15Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 16Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 17Ideogram 4.0 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1