- Home
- Image model comparison
- Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. Bria FIBO Lite
Qwen-Image-2.1vs.Bria FIBO Lite
Which one is better?
In our own test both are on par. Bria FIBO Lite has no arena rating yet. Neither has an API price.
Test images
Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.


Result for “Infographic”:Qwen-Image-2.1 ahead
What the rating looks at: Numbers, labels, and visual organization.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Test protocol of the images
Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.
Character and detail
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=1591420783, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Bria FIBO Lite: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=7, Fal route default seed 7; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.036000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:59 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: b29bb7e207ad464957ee060bbf0655104bcbece703360254e48daa3ec35a62d7
Bria FIBO Lite image SHA 256: f4b20af9156c21422981611762b9c7d37dafd359eaac5924e90f5df2d4c3fa0c
Infographic
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=1283422012, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, prior anonymous attempt refused before inference (ZeroGPU quota), completed through authenticated browser, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Bria FIBO Lite: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=7, Fal route default seed 7; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.036000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:59 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 316e38ed63ff401f86a7ceee9cc65c74413e0e9c7c899a6e6bf453acc2940dac
Bria FIBO Lite image SHA 256: 02da993206583f59c8a9c4caf72d50761abcd0f27e175ca3d8509427644895c0
Product photography
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=196359631, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Bria FIBO Lite: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=7, Fal route default seed 7; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.036000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:59 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 041f559d4261865b327fcae4f8bb0bd3b176c55a3b1255a042ab3e0fc4f9bc4b
Bria FIBO Lite image SHA 256: 33f4c25f309c14d8e540d88044467614b0c972b5f939bb05659bdf4b40db4912
Typography and layout
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=158818011, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Bria FIBO Lite: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=7, Fal route default seed 7; approximately 1MP output, estimated cost $0.036000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:59 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 4670269190f492154c05e3f18c4eb9e3938910ca1aca32503b6a1ceb16d39b38
Bria FIBO Lite image SHA 256: 881bc5d8fa507f6edba1c3179291cedf8dc5a52b6feaaec2d4f813f82757d4c0
The numbers at a glance
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 14 of 21
Bria FIBO Lite
not in the arena
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 40 of 108
Bria FIBO Lite
Rank 68 of 108
Qwen-Image-2.1
no API price
Bria FIBO Lite
no API price
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Qwen-Image-2.1
- Subscription
- No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €9.54 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 5 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: local, Web app.
- License
- Open weights, Qwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license.
Bria FIBO Lite
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: API.
- Weights
- unknown.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Nov 6, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Qwen-Image-2.1 | Bria FIBO Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | 1,227 | n/a |
| Arena rank | Rank 14 of 21 | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | 19,378 | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 65 | 40 |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 54 | 36 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 90 | 35 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 34 | 71 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 83 | 20 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | Sep 20, 2026 | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | openQwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license | unknown |
| Access | local, Web app | API |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 2K | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 5 | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Qwen-Image-2.1 model source, status source (verified Sep 22, 2026) · Bria FIBO Lite model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen-Image-2.1 and Bria FIBO Lite from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
More comparisons
Compare Qwen-Image-2.1 and Bria FIBO Lite with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
The most popular comparisons
- 1Krea 2 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 2FLUX.2 Flex vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 3Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 4FLUX.2 Klein 9B vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 5Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 6GPT Image 2 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 7Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 8Nano Banana Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 9FLUX.2 Max vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
Show all 18 comparisons
- 10Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
- 11GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 12HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 13Ideogram 4.0 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 14Nano Banana 2 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 15FLUX.2 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 16Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 17Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 18Seedream 4.0 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1