- Home
- Image model comparison
- Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. BAGEL-7B-MoT
Qwen-Image-2.1vs.BAGEL-7B-MoT
Which one is better?
In our own test both are on par. BAGEL-7B-MoT has no arena rating yet. Neither has an API price.
Test images
Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.


Result for “Infographic”:Qwen-Image-2.1 ahead
What the rating looks at: Numbers, labels, and visual organization.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Test protocol of the images
Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.
Character and detail
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=1591420783, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
BAGEL-7B-MoT: fal, provider-default image size; one output sampled; use_thought=false, one request, first output, seed=1668381318, Fal schema does not expose image size or image count fields, estimated cost $0.100000, generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:22 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: b29bb7e207ad464957ee060bbf0655104bcbece703360254e48daa3ec35a62d7
BAGEL-7B-MoT image SHA 256: f9a99e0e983d8731377afdf880911fc993d516b55c18059fd5cb3390fd01fd31
Infographic
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=1283422012, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, prior anonymous attempt refused before inference (ZeroGPU quota), completed through authenticated browser, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
BAGEL-7B-MoT: fal, provider-default image size; one output sampled; use_thought=false, one request, first output, seed=1401806471, Fal schema does not expose image size or image count fields, estimated cost $0.100000, generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:23 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 316e38ed63ff401f86a7ceee9cc65c74413e0e9c7c899a6e6bf453acc2940dac
BAGEL-7B-MoT image SHA 256: fd19fd4a68dfc264705c92209fcf45e3c8be4384c02433888b066683ee57c2ba
Product photography
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=196359631, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
BAGEL-7B-MoT: fal, provider-default image size; one output sampled; use_thought=false, one request, first output, seed=1385391411, Fal schema does not expose image size or image count fields, estimated cost $0.100000, generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:22 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 041f559d4261865b327fcae4f8bb0bd3b176c55a3b1255a042ab3e0fc4f9bc4b
BAGEL-7B-MoT image SHA 256: e8ef4e099fe8329b2bba090a2b8fee5cf926dfc5f91ad8e8694b4a4c78ab8455
Typography and layout
Qwen-Image-2.1: manual, 1:1, requested and received 1024x1024, one request, first output, Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 base, 40 steps, true CFG 1.0, prompt enhancement disabled, no negative prompt, no reference images, seed=158818011, official Space commit 5694809f4c56a4e8c40787b5392cecac36493c5d, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
BAGEL-7B-MoT: fal, provider-default image size; one output sampled; use_thought=false, one request, first output, seed=425487007, Fal schema does not expose image size or image count fields, estimated cost $0.100000, generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:21 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419
Qwen-Image-2.1 image SHA 256: 4670269190f492154c05e3f18c4eb9e3938910ca1aca32503b6a1ceb16d39b38
BAGEL-7B-MoT image SHA 256: 401dd23a2e6578a4e676d10543a9fea92d94d0f535dee90d6c7a25e56143257a
The numbers at a glance
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 14 of 21
BAGEL-7B-MoT
not in the arena
Qwen-Image-2.1
Rank 40 of 108
BAGEL-7B-MoT
Rank 76 of 108
Qwen-Image-2.1
no API price
BAGEL-7B-MoT
no API price
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Qwen-Image-2.1
- Subscription
- No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €9.54 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 5 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: local, Web app.
- License
- Open weights, Qwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license.
BAGEL-7B-MoT
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: local, Web app.
- License
- Open weights.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Nov 6, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Qwen-Image-2.1 | BAGEL-7B-MoT |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | 1,227 | n/a |
| Arena rank | Rank 14 of 21 | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | 19,378 | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 65 | 34 |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 54 | 11 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 90 | 88 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 34 | 32 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 83 | 6 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | Sep 20, 2026 | May 20, 2025 |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | openQwen Research License: non-commercial use only; commercial use requires a separate license | open |
| Access | local, Web app | local, Web app |
| Parameters | not published | 14 billion |
| Largest output | 2K | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 5 | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Qwen-Image-2.1 model source, status source (verified Sep 22, 2026) · BAGEL-7B-MoT model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen-Image-2.1 and BAGEL-7B-MoT from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
More comparisons
Compare Qwen-Image-2.1 and BAGEL-7B-MoT with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
The most popular comparisons
- 1Krea 2 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 2FLUX.2 Flex vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 3Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 4FLUX.2 Klein 9B vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 5Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 6GPT Image 2 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 7Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 8Nano Banana Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 9FLUX.2 Max vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
Show all 18 comparisons
- 10Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
- 11GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 12HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 13Ideogram 4.0 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 14Nano Banana 2 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 15FLUX.2 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 16Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 17Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
- 18Seedream 4.0 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1