Skip to main content

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbovs.Vidu Q2 Image

Which one is better?

In our own test, Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo leads. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.

Test images

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo: Product photography, first image from the fixed test run
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo90 out of 100
Vidu Q2 Image: Product photography, first image from the fixed test run
Vidu Q2 Image32 out of 100

Result for “Product photography”:Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

What the rating looks at: Materials, reflections, and fine details.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.018400, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:31 PM. Source

Vidu Q2 Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1; use the first provider output, one request, first output, seed=provider random, Budget reserves $0.10 per image, the public page rate; API metadata lists $0.05, estimated cost $0.100000, source 1440x1440, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:17 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo image SHA 256: 60c270da7b2ace74fcac4f55b962d4e01fae99265874d25857e2b461c00f3666

Vidu Q2 Image image SHA 256: 6fff5b245381e9812626ed77dbfc2339d20e769e7dccd1104c9c1f19283f1cb7

Infographic

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.018400, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:31 PM. Source

Vidu Q2 Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1; use the first provider output, one request, first output, seed=provider random, Budget reserves $0.10 per image, the public page rate; API metadata lists $0.05, estimated cost $0.100000, source 1440x1440, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:18 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo image SHA 256: 0650a13329baa39bb1923594082473a8138ecbe1ea95bb63017e7e1d76a7fafe

Vidu Q2 Image image SHA 256: f05906a0af47e56f355e332694eb092267260b475ce90c0f5e4242ce91462934

Product photography

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.018400, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:30 PM. Source

Vidu Q2 Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1; use the first provider output, one request, first output, seed=provider random, Budget reserves $0.10 per image, the public page rate; API metadata lists $0.05, estimated cost $0.100000, source 1440x1440, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:17 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo image SHA 256: 012d9320a2759329277e1e730e51da03aa4a0d992017a218228f88f07771dc08

Vidu Q2 Image image SHA 256: 1a83428b6d86bfee63528b77c9a6a9a6d96b4fe80e7b76e00727a7a895f92b58

Typography and layout

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.018400, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:30 PM. Source

Vidu Q2 Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1; use the first provider output, one request, first output, seed=provider random, Budget reserves $0.10 per image, the public page rate; API metadata lists $0.05, estimated cost $0.100000, source 1440x1440, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:11 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo image SHA 256: a052bc14d0b36849b7bd6b38e368bf2bd11d68217ab675dbea3c58d8a62f34dd

Vidu Q2 Image image SHA 256: 1858a3661e9c0a89560e6d717c851c168d43eb9b80f0d169d61749d608365ba2

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better
n/a

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

not in the arena

n/a

Vidu Q2 Image

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
69

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

Rank 23 of 108

31

Vidu Q2 Image

Rank 85 of 108

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better
n/a

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

no API price

n/a

Vidu Q2 Image

no API price

Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

Subscription
n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API
No API price known. Access: API.
Weights
unknown.

Vidu Q2 Image

Subscription
n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API
No API price known. Access: API.
Weights
unknown.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

KennzahlQwen Image 2.1 TurboVidu Q2 Image
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is bettern/an/a
Arena rankn/an/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer ratingn/an/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 1006931
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition5127
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details9032
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency4826
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization8937
API price
Per imagelower is bettern/an/a
100 imagesn/an/a
Profile
Releasedn/an/a
Weightsopen means: runs locallyunknownunknown
AccessAPIAPI
Parametersnot publishednot published
Largest output2K4K
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this modeln/an/a

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · Vidu Q2 Image model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo and Vidu Q2 Image from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

More comparisons

Compare Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo and Vidu Q2 Image with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup