Skip to main content

AlibabaHUMAINImage model matchup

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbovs.HUMAIN Image 1

Which one is better?

We have not tested HUMAIN Image 1 ourselves yet. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.

GraduallyBenchOur own benchmark0 to 100 · higher is better
74

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

Rank 21 of 108

n/a

HUMAIN Image 1

not tested yet

Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

Test images from GraduallyBench

Our own benchmarkThe images come from GraduallyBench, our own benchmark: every model gets the same four tasks, and two AI judges compare the images in pairs and blind.

Same task, the first image of each.

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo55 out of 100

No image from the four fixed tasks for HUMAIN Image 1 yet.

HUMAIN Image 1not tested yet

Result for “Typography and layout”:only Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo tested

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

“Ahead”: the 95 % ranges of both values do not overlap. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but the ranges overlap.

Missing image run for HUMAIN Image 1

The product photo is archived. Valid outputs are missing for the other three tasks. The exact submitted prompts behind the observed rejections are not independently verified. Last checked November 2, 2026. Run the three unchanged tasks through a verifiable authorized route and archive the original responses.

Documentation
Test protocol of the images

Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Product photography

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.018400, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:30 PM. Source

HUMAIN Image 1: manual, 1:1, one request, first output (first top-left candidate of native batch), exact UI model HUMAIN Image 1, provider-default random seed, native resolution provider default, fast mode not offered, no reference images, no selected effects, default content settings, source UI file Firefly_Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing 760597.png, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 10:31 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo image SHA 256: 012d9320a2759329277e1e730e51da03aa4a0d992017a218228f88f07771dc08

HUMAIN Image 1 image SHA 256: 4d45419d95ecd756be5e28816ca0b3d376c491685225f3602a61ec45c1476fff

Subscription and API

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

Subscription
n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API
No API price known (access: API).
Weights
Unknown.

HUMAIN Image 1

Subscription
No HUMAIN subscription includes this model. Through other providers from $9.99 a month (Adobe Firefly Standard, with limited credits). 7 plans in Germany.
Via API
No API price known (access: Web app).
Weights
Unknown.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 7, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (40 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

KennzahlQwen Image 2.1 TurboHUMAIN Image 1
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is bettern/an/a
Arena rankn/an/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer ratingn/an/a
GraduallyBenchour own benchmark, 0 to 10074n/a
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition55n/a
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details92n/a
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency67n/a
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization81n/a
API price
Per imagelower is bettern/an/a
100 imagesn/an/a
Profile
Releasedn/an/a
Weightsopen means: runs locallyunknownunknown
AccessAPIWeb app
Parametersnot publishednot published
Largest output2Knot consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this modeln/a7

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · HUMAIN Image 1 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on Artificial Analysis and LMArena; the sources are named under the card. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo and HUMAIN Image 1 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

More comparisons

Compare Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo and HUMAIN Image 1 with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup