AlibabaMIT HAN LabImage model matchup
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbovs.HART-0.7B-1024px
Which one is better?
We have not tested HART-0.7B-1024px ourselves yet. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
Rank 21 of 108
HART-0.7B-1024px
not tested yet
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Test images from GraduallyBench
Same task, the first image of each.
No image from the four fixed tasks for HART-0.7B-1024px yet.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: the 95 % ranges of both values do not overlap. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but the ranges overlap.
Missing image run for HART-0.7B-1024px
The reviewed vendor runner requires CUDA and custom CUDA kernels. No suitable MPS runtime has been verified for this Mac. The vendor-linked demo was unreachable on November 3, 2026 (HTTP 530), so no hosted test could be submitted there. Check the official demo once restored or a supported CUDA runtime for the exact model version.
DocumentationSubscription and API
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: API).
- Weights
- Unknown.
HART-0.7B-1024px
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: local).
- Weights
- Open weights.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
GraduallyBench from Nov 7, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (40 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo | HART-0.7B-1024px |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | n/a |
| Arena rank | n/a | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own benchmark, 0 to 100 | 74 | n/a |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 55 | n/a |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 92 | n/a |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 67 | n/a |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 81 | n/a |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | n/a | October 2024 |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | unknown | open |
| Access | API | local |
| Parameters | not published | 0.7 billion |
| Largest output | 2K | 1,024 × 1,024 pixels |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | n/a | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · HART-0.7B-1024px model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on Artificial Analysis and LMArena; the sources are named under the card. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo and HART-0.7B-1024px from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
More comparisons
Compare Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo and HART-0.7B-1024px with the models people compare them with most often.