Skip to main content

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbovs.WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite

Which one is better?

We have not tested WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite ourselves yet. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.

Same prompt, two images

Same task, the first image of each.

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo39 out of 100

No image from the four fixed tasks for WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite yet.This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run.

WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Litenot tested yet

Result for “Typography and layout”:only Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo tested

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Missing image run for WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite

This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run. Run the missing fixed tasks, archive the first output of each, and evaluate them blind.

Documentation

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better
n/a

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

not in the arena

n/a

WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
67

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

Rank 13 of 74

n/a

WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite

not tested yet

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better
n/a

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

no API price

n/a

WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite

no API price

Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

Subscription
n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API
No API price known. Access: API.
Weights
unknown.

WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite

Subscription
n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API
No API price known. Access: API.
Weights
unknown.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

KennzahlQwen Image 2.1 TurboWAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is bettern/an/a
Arena rankn/an/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer ratingn/an/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 10067n/a
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition39n/a
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details84n/a
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency53n/a
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization93n/a
API price
Per imagelower is bettern/an/a
100 imagesn/an/a
Profile
Releasedn/an/a
Weightsopen means: runs locallyunknownunknown
AccessAPIAPI
Parametersnot publishednot published
Largest output2K4K
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this modeln/an/a

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo and WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

Compare another matchup

More matchups

Related image model comparisons

Compare Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo and WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite with other important image models.

View the complete image model comparison