Qwen Image 2.1 Turbovs.AuraFlow v0.3
Which one is better?
We have not tested AuraFlow v0.3 ourselves yet. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.
Same prompt, two images
Same task, the first image of each.
No image from the four fixed tasks for AuraFlow v0.3 yet.This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Missing image run for AuraFlow v0.3
This model does not yet have a complete GraduallyBench run. Run the missing fixed tasks, archive the first output of each, and evaluate them blind.
DocumentationThe numbers at a glance
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
not in the arena
AuraFlow v0.3
not in the arena
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
Rank 13 of 74
AuraFlow v0.3
not tested yet
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
no API price
AuraFlow v0.3
no API price
Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: API.
- Weights
- unknown.
AuraFlow v0.3
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: local.
- License
- Open weights.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo | AuraFlow v0.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | n/a |
| Arena rank | n/a | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 67 | n/a |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 39 | n/a |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 84 | n/a |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 53 | n/a |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 93 | n/a |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | n/a | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | unknown | open |
| Access | API | local |
| Parameters | not published | 7 billion |
| Largest output | 2K | 1,536 × 1,536 pixels |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | n/a | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · AuraFlow v0.3 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo and AuraFlow v0.3 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related image model comparisons
Compare Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo and AuraFlow v0.3 with other important image models.