- Home
- Image model comparison
- Nano Banana 2 vs. GPT Image 1.5
Nano Banana 2vs.GPT Image 1.5
Which one is better?
In our own test both are on par. In the arena, Nano Banana 2 leads. Nano Banana 2 costs only half per image.
Test images
Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.


Result for “Character and detail”:GPT Image 1.5 ahead
What the rating looks at: Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Test protocol of the images
Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.
Character and detail
Nano Banana 2: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:15 PM. Source
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:17 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6
Nano Banana 2 image SHA 256: 5d3a70ed3fe3328484725565d9c91fb25fc7f745bd66872dae432444493a83de
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 0dff52ccd39400ac66ac8870c9ea937512ff1474688e70118688f420c38c2296
Infographic
Nano Banana 2: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:15 PM. Source
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:17 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f
Nano Banana 2 image SHA 256: 66123dd4e8cd5d22ecdca9cca8e4c5853a8046370aa4861ffee807a8c122c769
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 1c9ff59c32621c8b48b002dacb0ae66487262280c7c0a5b3d6456c81b248ebe9
Product photography
Nano Banana 2: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:15 PM. Source
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:16 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3
Nano Banana 2 image SHA 256: 509871921c450f6f07ec28f91a380992db1b3017108fd5928fe0aa9670a1ecdc
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 67cfa2f324447027ceb5f82e9446d40a1395b46ce425890a74606b4d97731cf6
Typography and layout
Nano Banana 2: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:59 PM. Source
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:59 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419
Nano Banana 2 image SHA 256: 06ae79c07d1604d3da3bbfa80bac73ac15c88af5cb8c013faaf5c9ea93092305
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 6a4cec86850fd371b65274198e2bf630b3cf36a096f9fb953d4bfe17c3222ebe
The numbers at a glance
Nano Banana 2
Rank 8 of 21
GPT Image 1.5
Rank 13 of 21
Nano Banana 2
Rank 51 of 108
GPT Image 1.5
Rank 29 of 108
Nano Banana 2
fairly expensive
GPT Image 1.5
expensive
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Nano Banana 2
- Subscription
- Free to use at Google (Google AI Free, with limited credits), more from €4.99 a month (Google AI Plus, with limited credits). Through other providers from ≈ €6.36 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 73 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- $0.067 per image, 100 images $6.70.
GPT Image 1.5
- Subscription
- No OpenAI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €6.36 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 42 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- $0.13 per image, 100 images $13.30.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Nov 6, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · API prices from Nov 6, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Nano Banana 2 | GPT Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | 1,257 | 1,236 |
| Arena rank | Rank 8 of 21 | Rank 13 of 21 |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | 77,495 | 173,798 |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 61 | 68 |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 100 | 60 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 45 | 52 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 36 | 89 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 63 | 72 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | $0.067 | $0.13 |
| 100 images | $6.70 | $13.30 |
| Profile | ||
| Released | February 2026 | December 2025 |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | proprietary | proprietary |
| Lifecycle | Previous generation to Nano Banana 2.1; Google recommends Nano Banana 2.1 for all new projects, the stable API has existed since May 28, 2026 and no shutdown is announced, the arena entry names the earlier pre-release configuration | Marked as deprecated by OpenAI; removed from the API on December 1, 2026 |
| Access | API, Web app | API, Web app |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 4K | 1,536 × 1,024 pixels |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 73 | 42 |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Nano Banana 2 model source, status source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · GPT Image 1.5 model source, status source (verified Aug 15, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
Artificial Analysis from Nov 6, 2026 · LMArena from Nov 6, 2026
All individual values with sources
| Rating | Nano Banana 2 | GPT Image 1.5 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text to Image Arena | 1,142 | 1,124 | Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Image Editing Arena | 1,125 | 1,116 | Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: 3D modeling | 1,256 | 1,218 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Agentic image generation | 1,257 | 1,237 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Art | 1,240 | 1,225 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Cartoon | 1,260 | 1,244 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Commercial design | 1,268 | 1,238 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Overall | 1,257 | 1,236 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Photorealism | 1,261 | 1,247 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Portraits | 1,255 | 1,259 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Text rendering | 1,294 | 1,251 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Agentic image generation | 1,377 | 1,360 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Multi-image editing | 1,370 | 1,342 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Agentic multi-image editing | 1,390 | 1,359 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Overall | 1,387 | 1,368 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
Published specialist tests
This pair shares 41 results from published research benchmarks.
GenExam from Aug 26, 2026 · Qwen Image Bench from Aug 26, 2026 · GRADE from Aug 26, 2026 · Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model card from Aug 26, 2026
All individual values with sources
| Rating | Nano Banana 2 | GPT Image 1.5 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| GenExam Mathematics, strict | 56% | 27% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Physics, strict | 74% | 46% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Chemistry, strict | 53% | 39% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Biology, strict | 66% | 56% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Geography, strict | 70% | 61% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Computer science, strict | 57% | 36% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Engineering, strict | 68% | 44% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Economics, strict | 64% | 43% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Music, strict | 51% | 29% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam History, strict | 83% | 51% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam overall, strict | 64% | 43% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Mathematics, relaxed | 88% | 66% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Physics, relaxed | 96% | 85% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Chemistry, relaxed | 90% | 78% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Biology, relaxed | 95% | 92% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Geography, relaxed | 95% | 93% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Computer science, relaxed | 89% | 76% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Engineering, relaxed | 96% | 86% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Economics, relaxed | 94% | 86% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Music, relaxed | 87% | 71% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam History, relaxed | 97% | 91% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam overall, relaxed | 93% | 82% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench quality | 55 / 100 | 55 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench aesthetics | 61 / 100 | 61 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench alignment | 62 / 100 | 62 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench real-world fidelity | 54 / 100 | 54 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench creative generation | 67 / 100 | 66 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench overall | 60 / 100 | 60 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GRADE reasoning | 73 / 100 | 55 / 100 | GRADERetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GRADE consistency | 86 / 100 | 82 / 100 | GRADERetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GRADE readability | 96 / 100 | 91 / 100 | GRADERetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GRADE accuracy | 40 / 100 | 16 / 100 | GRADERetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenAI-Bench overall preference | 1,073 | 1,047 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenAI-Bench visual quality | 1,129 | 975 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Infographics factuality | 1,074 | 985 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| General image editing | 1,047 | 995 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Character editing | 1,049 | 1,025 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Creative editing | 1,031 | 1,017 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Object and environment editing | 1,018 | 976 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Editing with 1-3 input images | 1,016 | 1,014 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Stylization | 1,031 | 996 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
More comparisons
Compare Nano Banana 2 and GPT Image 1.5 with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Nano Banana 2 vs. Nano Banana 2.1
- 2Nano Banana 2 vs. FLUX.2 Max
- 3GPT Image 2 vs. Nano Banana 2
- 4GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs. Nano Banana 2
- 5Nano Banana 2 vs. Seedream 5.0 Pro
- 6Nano Banana 2 vs. Ideogram 4.0
- 7Nano Banana 2 vs. Midjourney V8.2
- 8GPT Image 1.5 vs. FLUX.2 Flex
- 9Nano Banana 2 vs. Firefly Image Model 5