Skip to main content

Muse Imagevs.Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

Which one is better?

In our own test, Muse Image leads. Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px has no arena rating yet. Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px has no API price.

Same prompt, two images

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

Muse Image: Product photography, first image from the fixed test run
Muse Image90 out of 100
Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px: Product photography, first image from the fixed test run
Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px8 out of 100

Result for “Product photography”:Muse Image ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

What the rating looks at: Materials, reflections, and fine details.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one image, provider-side randomize seed enabled, observed seed 1646387073, native 1024x1024, 2 inference steps, guidance 4.5, no prompt enhancement, no reference images, exact checkpoint Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_Sprint_0.6B_1024px_diffusers, Space commit b42328123ed688df4bee46e52c60cc1dc62c045a, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Muse Image image SHA 256: 356427fe1ec15a444aae4eab2194344c7fe6b17ef205a8db16c1d64dbacb750e

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px image SHA 256: 17356f29ad7fa9644e9683ec624d0c01ad56ff0c14d078db5f78f3b6bcf6a45e

Infographic

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one image, provider-side randomize seed enabled, observed seed 1798448399, native 1024x1024, 2 inference steps, guidance 4.5, no prompt enhancement, no reference images, exact checkpoint Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_Sprint_0.6B_1024px_diffusers, Space commit b42328123ed688df4bee46e52c60cc1dc62c045a, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Muse Image image SHA 256: c8b096001990f57cb5225f6387485b391a4a5e3c3031e7b0524a4c19e1e01bc8

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px image SHA 256: efbab43ef1980109bff4084afe6162c4915e4fb55185617adaac5713f20b5e24

Product photography

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one image, provider-side randomize seed enabled, observed seed 520567323, native 1024x1024, 2 inference steps, guidance 4.5, no prompt enhancement, no reference images, exact checkpoint Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_Sprint_0.6B_1024px_diffusers, Space commit b42328123ed688df4bee46e52c60cc1dc62c045a, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Muse Image image SHA 256: 0cb5d4c3dbe33c840ba87f0e8af255deec9e7e02eb6c7f172310af433e78fdb6

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px image SHA 256: ac2d880a5b40924b518e25c61c5e077ffc9c5825f3eb896d733096ac6c631e46

Typography and layout

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px: manual, 1:1, one request, first output, one image, provider-side randomize seed enabled, observed seed 1229099615, native 1024x1024, 2 inference steps, guidance 4.5, no prompt enhancement, no reference images, exact checkpoint Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_Sprint_0.6B_1024px_diffusers, Space commit b42328123ed688df4bee46e52c60cc1dc62c045a, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:42 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Muse Image image SHA 256: b8232890082d6bdd72dd7be99d98a573566a2c62f94597ecdda2bd9110e2e143

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px image SHA 256: fd10095819c7746d6b52cc50e3d63f9d81eff271ad1edb4d3ba667a954098ac7

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better
1,269

Muse Image

Rank 7 of 22

n/a

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
74

Muse Image

Rank 7 of 74

5

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

Rank 73 of 74

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better
$0.01

Muse Image

cheap

n/a

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

no API price

Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

Muse Image

Subscription
Free to use at Meta (Meta AI Free). Through other providers from ≈ €9.59 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 6 plans in Germany.
Via API
$0.01 per image, 100 images $1.

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

Subscription
n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API
No API price known. Access: local.
License
Open weights.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

Arena rating (LMArena) from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · API prices from Oct 28, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

KennzahlMuse ImageSana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better1,269n/a
Arena rankRank 7 of 22n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating53,444n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100745
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition762
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details908
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency646
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization664
API price
Per imagelower is better$0.01n/a
100 images$1n/a
Profile
ReleasedJul 7, 2026Mar 22, 2025
Weightsopen means: runs locallyproprietaryopen
AccessAPI, Web applocal
Parametersnot published0.6 billion
Largest outputnot consistently publishednot consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model6n/a

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: Muse Image model source (verified Sep 26, 2026) · Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Muse Image and Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

Compare another matchup

More matchups

Related image model comparisons

Compare Muse Image and Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px with other important image models.

View the complete image model comparison