Skip to main content

Muse Imagevs.Grok Imagine Image 2.0

Which one is better?

In our own test both are on par. In the arena, Grok Imagine Image 2.0 leads. Grok Imagine Image 2.0 costs 6.0 times as much per image.

Test images

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

Muse Image: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run
Muse Image86 out of 100
Grok Imagine Image 2.0: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run
Grok Imagine Image 2.071 out of 100

Result for “Typography and layout”:Muse Image slightly ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source

Grok Imagine Image 2.0: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, quality medium, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.060000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:46 AM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Muse Image image SHA 256: 356427fe1ec15a444aae4eab2194344c7fe6b17ef205a8db16c1d64dbacb750e

Grok Imagine Image 2.0 image SHA 256: 95148f93193910361a680d5cff305d51bb06d967cb8b35e7ec732bd8501beccc

Infographic

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source

Grok Imagine Image 2.0: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, quality medium, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.060000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:47 AM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Muse Image image SHA 256: c8b096001990f57cb5225f6387485b391a4a5e3c3031e7b0524a4c19e1e01bc8

Grok Imagine Image 2.0 image SHA 256: 732d7d3978293b5acd7aba0ec8534056bfa9bd5f6d2024c5eb7275d5bf203ba6

Product photography

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source

Grok Imagine Image 2.0: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, quality medium, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.060000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:45 AM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Muse Image image SHA 256: 0cb5d4c3dbe33c840ba87f0e8af255deec9e7e02eb6c7f172310af433e78fdb6

Grok Imagine Image 2.0 image SHA 256: 57f2809d2dc95671f5207c2cfc25f629c05be17edfe9bf87ca42d3d33119200e

Typography and layout

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source

Grok Imagine Image 2.0: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, resolution 1K, quality medium, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.060000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:44 AM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Muse Image image SHA 256: b8232890082d6bdd72dd7be99d98a573566a2c62f94597ecdda2bd9110e2e143

Grok Imagine Image 2.0 image SHA 256: 4dae1c4c90d277eed2983780d71f40b4758238ea15a020047c1329fb220e5b51

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better
1,268

Muse Image

Rank 7 of 21

1,317

Grok Imagine Image 2.0

Rank 5 of 21

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
78

Muse Image

Rank 4 of 108

73

Grok Imagine Image 2.0

Rank 16 of 108

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better
$0.01

Muse Image

cheap

$0.06

Grok Imagine Image 2.0

fairly cheap

Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

Muse Image

Subscription
Free to use at Meta (Meta AI Free). Through other providers from ≈ €9.54 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 6 plans in Germany.
Via API
$0.01 per image, 100 images $1.

Grok Imagine Image 2.0

Subscription
No xAI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €15.90 a month (Runway Standard, with limited credits). 5 plans in Germany.
Via API
$0.06 per image, 100 images $6.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

Arena rating (LMArena) from Nov 6, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · API prices from Nov 6, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

KennzahlMuse ImageGrok Imagine Image 2.0
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better1,2681,317
Arena rankRank 7 of 21Rank 5 of 21
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating57,56810,830
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 1007873
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition8671
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details8168
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency6175
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization8677
API price
Per imagelower is better$0.01$0.06
100 images$1$6
Profile
ReleasedJul 7, 2026Aug 7, 2026
Weightsopen means: runs locallyproprietaryproprietary
AccessAPI, Web appAPI, Web app
Parametersnot publishednot published
Largest outputnot consistently published2K
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model65

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: Muse Image model source (verified Sep 26, 2026) · Grok Imagine Image 2.0 model source (verified Sep 28, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

Arena rating per categoryfrom votes by users · higher is betterMuse ImageGrok Imagine Image 2.0
Text to Image ArenaMuse Image: 1,128Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,166Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Image Editing ArenaMuse Image: 1,128Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,116level
Text to Image: 3D modelingMuse Image: 1,238Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,291Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Text to Image: Agentic image generationMuse Image: 1,235Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,287Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Text to Image: ArtMuse Image: 1,259Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,328Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Text to Image: CartoonMuse Image: 1,275Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,352Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Text to Image: Commercial designMuse Image: 1,258Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,325Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Text to Image: OverallMuse Image: 1,268Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,317Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Text to Image: PhotorealismMuse Image: 1,278Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,312Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Text to Image: PortraitsMuse Image: 1,290Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,332Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Text to Image: Text renderingMuse Image: 1,293Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,349Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Image Editing: Agentic image generationMuse Image: 1,382Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,426Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead
Image Editing: OverallMuse Image: 1,399Grok Imagine Image 2.0: 1,438Grok Imagine Image 2.0 ahead

Artificial Analysis from Nov 6, 2026 · LMArena from Nov 6, 2026

All individual values with sources
RatingMuse ImageGrok Imagine Image 2.0Source
Text to Image Arena1,1281,166Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Image Editing Arena1,1281,116Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Text to Image: 3D modeling1,2381,291LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Text to Image: Agentic image generation1,2351,287LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Text to Image: Art1,2591,328LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Text to Image: Cartoon1,2751,352LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Text to Image: Commercial design1,2581,325LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Text to Image: Overall1,2681,317LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Text to Image: Photorealism1,2781,312LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Text to Image: Portraits1,2901,332LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Text to Image: Text rendering1,2931,349LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Image Editing: Agentic image generation1,3821,426LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026
Image Editing: Overall1,3991,438LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026

More comparisons

Compare Muse Image and Grok Imagine Image 2.0 with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup