MidjourneyAlibabaImage model matchup
Midjourney V8.2vs.Qwen Image 3.0
Which one is better?
We have not tested Midjourney V8.2 ourselves yet. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.
Midjourney V8.2
not tested yet
Qwen Image 3.0
Rank 26 of 108
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench Image v2 run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Test images from GraduallyBench Image v2
Same task, the first image of each.
No image from the four fixed tasks for Midjourney V8.2 yet.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only Qwen Image 3.0 tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: the 95 % ranges of both values do not overlap. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but the ranges overlap.
Missing image run for Midjourney V8.2
No Midjourney subscription was available for this test. V8.2 remains open by request; V8.1 results cannot be transferred. Last checked November 2, 2026. Use authorized V8.2 access to run the missing tasks and save the first outputs.
DocumentationSubscription and API
Midjourney V8.2
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: Web app).
- Weights
- Closed weights.
Qwen Image 3.0
- Subscription
- No Alibaba subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €16 a month (Magnific Premium, with limited credits). 6 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: API, Web app).
- Weights
- Unknown.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
GraduallyBench Image v2 from Nov 7, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (45 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Midjourney V8.2 | Qwen Image 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | n/a |
| Arena rank | n/a | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | n/a |
| GraduallyBench Image v2our own benchmark, 0 to 100 | n/a | 72 |
| GraduallyBench Image v2 by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | n/a | 37 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | n/a | 93 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | n/a | 68 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | n/a | 91 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | Jul 24, 2026 | n/a |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | proprietary | unknown |
| Lifecycle | Current default model since July 24, 2026 | no notice |
| Access | Web app | API, Web app |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 2K | 2K |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | n/a | 6 |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Midjourney V8.2 model source, status source (verified Sep 22, 2026) · Qwen Image 3.0 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on Artificial Analysis and LMArena; the sources are named under the card. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Midjourney V8.2 and Qwen Image 3.0 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
More comparisons
Compare Midjourney V8.2 and Qwen Image 3.0 with the models people compare them with most often.