Skip to main content

MAI-Image-2.5vs.Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo

Which one is better?

In our own test, MAI-Image-2.5 leads. Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo has no arena rating yet. Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo has no API price.

Test images

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

MAI-Image-2.5: Product photography, first image from the fixed test run
MAI-Image-2.570 out of 100
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo: Product photography, first image from the fixed test run
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo6 out of 100

Result for “Product photography”:MAI-Image-2.5 ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

What the rating looks at: Materials, reflections, and fine details.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

MAI-Image-2.5: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, provider default 1K resolution, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.048508, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:26 PM. Source

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo: manual, local PyTorch 2.11.0, Diffusers 0.38.0; Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo@47cd26d3c211b030c64ffe60d63b2e17a7c519c2; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=4, guidance=1.0, seed=2111621457284287488; mps; native PyTorch fallback is enabled by PYTORCH_ENABLE_MPS_FALLBACK=1; actual CPU operation use is not measured; bfloat16; upstream boogu-project/Boogu-Image@9b327526b1053e1f27f1bd0ae36b20ce2c39cb9e; reviewed MPS device allowlist and empty-reference self-attention only on original CPU SDPA, unchanged arguments and dtype; nonempty attention remains on MPS; no CUDA numeric equivalence claimed; native VAE input saved after scaling and shift, decoded float output finite before native same-size interpolation; native instruction template without rewriting; original DMD student inference, conditioning sigma 0.001, generated Nov 2, 2026, 11:24 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

MAI-Image-2.5 image SHA 256: ca1c58688ae4601975d7e1f7b58bb43a0a999e736f610d9f51cd11e06284bced

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo image SHA 256: 0c90d3a3e12870784d8b576ac3ace689b6cb627a4222f7cfc4a0d3793b9e4a37

Infographic

MAI-Image-2.5: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, provider default 1K resolution, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.048538, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:26 PM. Source

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo: manual, local PyTorch 2.11.0, Diffusers 0.38.0; Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo@47cd26d3c211b030c64ffe60d63b2e17a7c519c2; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=4, guidance=1.0, seed=8524023330556932596; mps; native PyTorch fallback is enabled by PYTORCH_ENABLE_MPS_FALLBACK=1; actual CPU operation use is not measured; bfloat16; upstream boogu-project/Boogu-Image@9b327526b1053e1f27f1bd0ae36b20ce2c39cb9e; reviewed MPS device allowlist and empty-reference self-attention only on original CPU SDPA, unchanged arguments and dtype; nonempty attention remains on MPS; no CUDA numeric equivalence claimed; native VAE input saved after scaling and shift, decoded float output finite before native same-size interpolation; native instruction template without rewriting; original DMD student inference, conditioning sigma 0.001, generated Nov 2, 2026, 11:24 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

MAI-Image-2.5 image SHA 256: eaf00a906231e8859f98ef5dc2cce7e8017797819aea453305a4ef0e970d4dbf

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo image SHA 256: 096ae82e5a28ef1095f159019c41983c84a0c670a76e752fb3a1f9600fa7c45a

Product photography

MAI-Image-2.5: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, provider default 1K resolution, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.048513, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:25 PM. Source

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo: manual, local PyTorch 2.11.0, Diffusers 0.38.0; Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo@47cd26d3c211b030c64ffe60d63b2e17a7c519c2; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=4, guidance=1.0, seed=9219148100655939974; mps; native PyTorch fallback is enabled by PYTORCH_ENABLE_MPS_FALLBACK=1; actual CPU operation use is not measured; bfloat16; upstream boogu-project/Boogu-Image@9b327526b1053e1f27f1bd0ae36b20ce2c39cb9e; reviewed MPS device allowlist and empty-reference self-attention only on original CPU SDPA, unchanged arguments and dtype; nonempty attention remains on MPS; no CUDA numeric equivalence claimed; native VAE input saved after scaling and shift, decoded float output finite before native same-size interpolation; native instruction template without rewriting; original DMD student inference, conditioning sigma 0.001, generated Nov 2, 2026, 11:23 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

MAI-Image-2.5 image SHA 256: 67d4930b711fac61482231c4bc270cfcdb41c1b0daf653045781fb2126e237dd

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo image SHA 256: 50719aadf378d21848c83dbdb510a8134c80be05cbb2b718182a95e9cbb28164

Typography and layout

MAI-Image-2.5: openrouter, aspect ratio 1:1, provider default 1K resolution, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.048473, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:03 PM. Source

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo: manual, local PyTorch 2.11.0, Diffusers 0.38.0; Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo@47cd26d3c211b030c64ffe60d63b2e17a7c519c2; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=4, guidance=1.0, seed=4970356096182813142; mps; native PyTorch fallback is enabled by PYTORCH_ENABLE_MPS_FALLBACK=1; actual CPU operation use is not measured; bfloat16; upstream boogu-project/Boogu-Image@9b327526b1053e1f27f1bd0ae36b20ce2c39cb9e; reviewed MPS device allowlist and empty-reference self-attention only on original CPU SDPA, unchanged arguments and dtype; nonempty attention remains on MPS; no CUDA numeric equivalence claimed; native VAE input saved after scaling and shift, decoded float output finite before native same-size interpolation; native instruction template without rewriting; original DMD student inference, conditioning sigma 0.001; two local attempts: original MPSGraph SIGABRT before output; one identical-prompt, identical-seed technical repeat after reviewed backend-only correction, first output retained; exact failing original operator is not proven, generated Nov 2, 2026, 11:18 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

MAI-Image-2.5 image SHA 256: 4c8a60555b57b8c3b5ebaa131371d1bba9d31bfafe7aaa772554969f7c28cb08

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo image SHA 256: cec0e99f796e6d0e4dafc517afc93fd93041aecbd52cef74a421ea9c3a15ab69

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better
1,253

MAI-Image-2.5

Rank 9 of 21

n/a

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
69

MAI-Image-2.5

Rank 26 of 108

9

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo

Rank 104 of 108

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better
$0.048

MAI-Image-2.5

fairly cheap

n/a

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo

no API price

Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

MAI-Image-2.5

Subscription
No Microsoft AI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €19.04 a month (Magnific Premium, with limited credits). 6 plans in Germany.
Via API
$0.048 per image, 100 images $4.81.

Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo

Subscription
n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API
No API price known. Access: local.
License
Open weights.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

Arena rating (LMArena) from Nov 6, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · API prices from Nov 6, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

KennzahlMAI-Image-2.5Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better1,253n/a
Arena rankRank 9 of 21n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating61,222n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100699
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition8218
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details706
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency555
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization698
API price
Per imagelower is better$0.048n/a
100 images$4.81n/a
Profile
ReleasedJune 2026n/a
Weightsopen means: runs locallyproprietaryopen
LifecyclePreview in Microsoft Foundryno notice
AccessAPI, Web applocal
Parameters20 billion10 billion
Largest output1,048,576 pixelsnot consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model6n/a

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: MAI-Image-2.5 model source, status source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for MAI-Image-2.5 and Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

More comparisons

Compare MAI-Image-2.5 and Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1MAI-Image-2.5 vs. Nano Banana 2.1