Lumina-Image 2.0vs.Z-Image Base
Which one is better?
In our own test, Z-Image Base leads. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.
Same prompt, two images
Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.
Result for “Character and detail”:Z-Image Base slightly ahead
What the rating looks at: Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Test protocol of the images
Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.
Character and detail
Lumina-Image 2.0: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.150000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:38 PM. Source
Z-Image Base: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1788591829, estimated cost $0.020000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:35 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6
Lumina-Image 2.0 image SHA 256: 8747df0401d91598486735bfff5d6bac6c139727a8bc50c60bf7f697f678b85f
Z-Image Base image SHA 256: 7a9c8b160230e302e618ad99ed1047d36b66bdc759d8455d0479048c442cdf75
Infographic
Lumina-Image 2.0: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.150000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:38 PM. Source
Z-Image Base: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=2013338091, estimated cost $0.020000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:35 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f
Lumina-Image 2.0 image SHA 256: b937b28f3c3209280c5828e18c85341d3ca443175020ca1e407dae035b5df14f
Z-Image Base image SHA 256: b306143deb4d133e60ff4840e5fb8271d445f5a4944b98e89346763d84a19d30
Product photography
Lumina-Image 2.0: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.150000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:38 PM. Source
Z-Image Base: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1140297503, estimated cost $0.020000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:35 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3
Lumina-Image 2.0 image SHA 256: 74b79fcbad7565e29995c941d2b488d2edde884b307ed99e47fad994424e9dfc
Z-Image Base image SHA 256: 11b631f154a0ddff86df21d6d8ffab0d208d51df894f3563dd6818d20b450aae
Typography and layout
Lumina-Image 2.0: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.150000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:37 PM. Source
Z-Image Base: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=194884257, estimated cost $0.010486, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:20 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419
Lumina-Image 2.0 image SHA 256: f132c159d659fb76c94cd82f1decb617c475b9c4095b177d02b73f09f2954df0
Z-Image Base image SHA 256: 62dbb49a07e3efe0f82ae9051fac20fce00a8f82b57ebe37a526b5176523c84f
The numbers at a glance
Lumina-Image 2.0
not in the arena
Z-Image Base
not in the arena
Lumina-Image 2.0
Rank 72 of 74
Z-Image Base
Rank 63 of 74
Lumina-Image 2.0
no API price
Z-Image Base
no API price
Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Lumina-Image 2.0
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: local.
- License
- Open weights.
Z-Image Base
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known. Access: local.
- License
- Open weights.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Lumina-Image 2.0 | Z-Image Base |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | n/a |
| Arena rank | n/a | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | n/a |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 7 | 24 |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 1 | 25 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 4 | 15 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 17 | 47 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 6 | 10 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | Jan 25, 2025 | Jan 27, 2026 |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | open | open |
| Access | local | local |
| Parameters | 2.6 billion | 6 billion |
| Largest output | not consistently published | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | n/a | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Lumina-Image 2.0 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · Z-Image Base model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Lumina-Image 2.0 and Z-Image Base from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related image model comparisons
Compare Lumina-Image 2.0 and Z-Image Base with other important image models.