Luma Uni-1.1 Maxvs.Kling Image 3.0 Omni

Which one is better?

In our own test both are on par. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

Luma Uni-1.1 Max: Infographic, first image from the fixed test run — Luma Uni-1.1 Max69 out of 100

Kling Image 3.0 Omni: Infographic, first image from the fixed test run — Kling Image 3.0 Omni18 out of 100

Result for “Infographic”:Luma Uni-1.1 Max ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

What the rating looks at: Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Luma Uni-1.1 Max: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.102000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:47 PM. Source

Kling Image 3.0 Omni: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Kling Omni 3, resolution 1K, single result, estimated cost $0.028000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:29 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Luma Uni-1.1 Max image SHA 256: 8034ca5627e1a256cdf1d06fc87b583d91d971d02edc9af7df52cd6721d3ea9c

Kling Image 3.0 Omni image SHA 256: 5d326e157b4f3f7c54252761c0e49395f8e32244ba86f2e45d13eae353a9e807

Infographic

Luma Uni-1.1 Max: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.102000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:49 PM. Source

Kling Image 3.0 Omni: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Kling Omni 3, resolution 1K, single result, estimated cost $0.028000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:30 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Luma Uni-1.1 Max image SHA 256: 36dea214eb680804d4fea089eec3d4f10a4bf7b7a71c7a80f92313a37e8c2f73

Kling Image 3.0 Omni image SHA 256: e0ee4fab714481cc883130b588f90261b6acc24ff9da0f9e462e0ed6aafd1232

Product photography

Luma Uni-1.1 Max: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.102000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:43 PM. Source

Kling Image 3.0 Omni: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Kling Omni 3, resolution 1K, single result, estimated cost $0.028000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:29 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Luma Uni-1.1 Max image SHA 256: 4890cdf8b858c5740124e3b2ba038b73f6a35decc7e3e3d920890462b6e89c2b

Kling Image 3.0 Omni image SHA 256: b4d821252e19e1b7da304679af6a70353323cec9c80d36a769aaba1225b9274e

Typography and layout

Luma Uni-1.1 Max: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.102000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:40 PM. Source

Kling Image 3.0 Omni: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Kling Omni 3, resolution 1K, single result, estimated cost $0.028000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:29 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Luma Uni-1.1 Max image SHA 256: d2a6162d544def0a283ed62f939b33252636d296a21142111851ecdedd2989d3

Kling Image 3.0 Omni image SHA 256: a9ab0938f07d6478dcbfd9f39e8dd17b8a5fe6216dfd4195789095cb6a6b9439

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better

n/a

Luma Uni-1.1 Max

not in the arena

n/a

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better

Luma Uni-1.1 Max

Rank 19 of 74

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

Rank 53 of 74

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better

n/a

Luma Uni-1.1 Max

no API price

n/a

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

no API price

Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

Luma Uni-1.1 Max

Subscription: n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API: No API price known. Access: API, Web app.

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

Subscription: n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API: No API price known. Access: API.
Weights: unknown.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

Kennzahl	Luma Uni-1.1 Max	Kling Image 3.0 Omni
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better	n/a	n/a
Arena rank	n/a	n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating	n/a	n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100	63	38
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition	63	77
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details	56	22
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency	64	35
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization	69	18
API price
Per imagelower is better	n/a	n/a
100 images	n/a	n/a
Profile
Released	May 2026	Feb 5, 2026
Weightsopen means: runs locally	proprietary	unknown
Access	API, Web app	API
Parameters	not published	not published
Largest output	2K	4K
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model	n/a	n/a

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: Luma Uni-1.1 Max model source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · Kling Image 3.0 Omni model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Luma Uni-1.1 Max and Kling Image 3.0 Omni from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

Compare another matchup

First image modelSecond image model

More matchups

Compare Luma Uni-1.1 Max and Kling Image 3.0 Omni with other important image models.

View the complete image model comparison

Same prompt, two images

The numbers at a glance

Luma Uni-1.1 Max

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

All data side by side

Arena ratings by category

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

Compare another matchup

Related image model comparisons