Head-to-head comparison

Luma UNI 1 Max vs. FLUX.2 Flex

Compare shared capability tests, arena scores with documented retrieval dates, task-specific image pricing, and verified specifications. Research benchmarks, preference arenas, and our n = 1 samples remain separate.

shared result series: 6
shared sample prompts: 4
latest arena retrieval: 2026-08-26

First image modelSecond image model

Specifications and cost

General specifications and task-specific pricing

A model can have one price for generating new images and another for editing. Prices therefore remain tied to the corresponding arena configuration.

Specifications and pricing for Luma UNI 1 Max and FLUX.2 Flex
Attribute	Luma UNI 1 Max	FLUX.2 Flex
Provider	Luma Labs	Black Forest Labs
Released	May 2026	November 2025
Access	API, Web app	API, Web app
Lifecycle	No separate lifecycle notice	No separate lifecycle notice
Weights	Proprietary	Proprietary
Parameters	Not published	Not published
Maximum output	2K	4 Megapixel
Arena configuration	Max	Flex
Text-to-image price	$100 per 1,000 images	$60 per 1,000 images
Editing price	$100 per 1,000 images	$120 per 1,000 images
Technical source	Model sourceVerified 2026-08-15	Model sourceVerified 2026-08-15

Luma UNI 1 MaxFLUX.2 Flex

Text to Image ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels

Luma UNI 1 Max$100

FLUX.2 Flex$60

Image Editing ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels

Luma UNI 1 Max$100

FLUX.2 Flex$120

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Prompt adherence and specialist tests

Shared capability benchmarks

Every matchup includes the same four Gradually sample tasks. For each task, one archived first output from every model is ranked in three differently ordered, model-blind passes. The published 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. It must still be read as an n = 1 sample per model. No exact shared result from the integrated research benchmarks is available for this pair.

Luma UNI 1 MaxFLUX.2 Flex

Gradually sample test: Typography and layoutMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each

Luma UNI 1 Max50.6 / 100

FLUX.2 Flex76.6 / 100

Gradually sample test: Product photographyMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each

Luma UNI 1 Max65.4 / 100

FLUX.2 Flex46.9 / 100

Gradually sample test: Character and detailMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each

Luma UNI 1 Max58 / 100

FLUX.2 Flex39.5 / 100

Gradually sample test: InfographicMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each

Luma UNI 1 Max64.2 / 100

FLUX.2 Flex25.9 / 100

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Capability benchmark scores for Luma UNI 1 Max and FLUX.2 Flex
Benchmark	Luma UNI 1 Max	FLUX.2 Flex
Gradually sample test: Typography and layout	50.6 / 100 Mean rank: 14.33 (17 / 15 / 11) Five rubric scores Headline: 1.67 / 2 Subline: 1.67 / 2 Text control: 1.67 / 2 Visual brief: 1.33 / 2 Layout: 1 / 2	Higher blind-rank score76.6 / 100 Mean rank: 7.33 (6 / 10 / 6) Five rubric scores Headline: 1.67 / 2 Subline: 1.67 / 2 Text control: 1.67 / 2 Visual brief: 1.33 / 2 Layout: 1 / 2
Gradually sample test: Product photography	Higher blind-rank score65.4 / 100 Mean rank: 10.33 (17 / 4 / 10) Five rubric scores Subject: 1.33 / 2 Time: 1.33 / 2 Watch details: 1.33 / 2 Photography: 1.33 / 2 Exclusions: 1.33 / 2	46.9 / 100 Mean rank: 15.33 (12 / 19 / 15) Five rubric scores Subject: 1.33 / 2 Time: 1.33 / 2 Watch details: 1.33 / 2 Photography: 1.33 / 2 Exclusions: 1.33 / 2
Gradually sample test: Character and detail	Higher blind-rank score58 / 100 Mean rank: 12.33 (7 / 16 / 14) Five rubric scores Scene: 1.33 / 2 Wardrobe: 1.33 / 2 Anatomy: 1 / 2 Props: 0.67 / 2 Environment: 1 / 2	39.5 / 100 Mean rank: 17.33 (27 / 7 / 18) Five rubric scores Scene: 1.33 / 2 Wardrobe: 1.33 / 2 Anatomy: 1.33 / 2 Props: 1 / 2 Environment: 1 / 2
Gradually sample test: Infographic	Higher blind-rank score64.2 / 100 Mean rank: 10.67 (8 / 12 / 12) Five rubric scores Title: 1.67 / 2 Sequence: 1.67 / 2 Labels: 1.33 / 2 Diagram: 1.67 / 2 Clarity: 1 / 2	25.9 / 100 Mean rank: 21 (21 / 19 / 23) Five rubric scores Title: 1.67 / 2 Sequence: 1 / 2 Labels: 1 / 2 Diagram: 1 / 2 Clarity: 1 / 2
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Independent preference tests

Shared arena benchmarks

Artificial Analysis and Arena derive scores from blind comparisons. Raters see outputs for the same prompt and choose the image they prefer. Separate series cover text rendering, photorealism, portraits, art, commercial design, and image editing. Confidence intervals indicate how certain a measured lead is.

2 shared result series

Luma UNI 1 MaxFLUX.2 Flex

Text to Image ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Luma UNI 1 Max1,222 Elo

FLUX.2 Flex1,224 Elo

Image Editing ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Luma UNI 1 Max1,220 Elo

FLUX.2 Flex1,162 Elo

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Arena benchmark scores for Luma UNI 1 Max and FLUX.2 Flex
Benchmark	Luma UNI 1 Max	FLUX.2 Flex	Source
Text to Image Arena	1,222 Elo Rank 21, 95% confidence interval: ±10, 4,802 ratings	No clear lead1,224 Elo Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±10, 5,047 ratings	Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-08-26
Image Editing Arena	Higher score1,220 Elo Rank 14, 95% confidence interval: ±8, 6,420 ratings	1,162 Elo Rank 37, 95% confidence interval: ±7, 7,847 ratings	Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-08-26
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Visual comparison

Sample images

Our images complement preference data, but do not replace it. The prompt, request count, and selection rule match. Provider resolution, quality tier, randomness, and prompt processing remain visible limitations, so this is not a fully controlled laboratory test.

Largely standardized comparison protocol. Both models receive the same archived prompt, exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier, and prompt processing can still differ. These images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency

Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Luma UNI 1 Max. Provider fal.ai, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.102000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), model ID luma/agent/uni-1/v1/max, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:47 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Flex. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-flex, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:25 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Luma UNI 1 Max, image SHA 256: 8034ca5627e1a256cdf1d06fc87b583d91d971d02edc9af7df52cd6721d3ea9c

Luma UNI 1 Max, request SHA 256: 81275c8abc4186d3dd5205d2f141c1ac6765e2217b9c7ea23caa622a232ab8a5

FLUX.2 Flex, image SHA 256: 43b43d5782192d7284de2b824dd1caaaa6b25032d22fc3f8565d438b137089f3

FLUX.2 Flex, request SHA 256: fe5b22589e6505017dc44f4729b1bb60b15820ba3673354d03a69c8b82831953

Infographic

Numbers, labels, and visual organization

Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Luma UNI 1 Max. Provider fal.ai, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.102000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), model ID luma/agent/uni-1/v1/max, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:49 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Flex. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-flex, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:25 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Luma UNI 1 Max, image SHA 256: 36dea214eb680804d4fea089eec3d4f10a4bf7b7a71c7a80f92313a37e8c2f73

Luma UNI 1 Max, request SHA 256: b99624302d834bf44e21100914a69d38225d34be413ad69decf73e2ad3a70c71

FLUX.2 Flex, image SHA 256: 105f60cdeb71a27021ffff1ad3c0ad919df4e5c74ad83b4628fbd64a8d795a09

FLUX.2 Flex, request SHA 256: 11d4ec056332340dc822c82021ef10c6a6aa92de6e44dc931a90b7cbb6f14146

Product photography

Materials, reflections, and fine details

Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Luma UNI 1 Max. Provider fal.ai, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.102000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), model ID luma/agent/uni-1/v1/max, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:43 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Flex. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-flex, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:25 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Luma UNI 1 Max, image SHA 256: 4890cdf8b858c5740124e3b2ba038b73f6a35decc7e3e3d920890462b6e89c2b

Luma UNI 1 Max, request SHA 256: 3f4a422b01687a8af7e9ef60e1b5a15251459af4c4ab6a6318a13f5b415a2b54

FLUX.2 Flex, image SHA 256: 9fef39b1500635ddbf78bcb8d3d9a68463ce952aa1fab89d12f6efe023907de7

FLUX.2 Flex, request SHA 256: 1c864c5e5d7f1e7008f15466fd0786f801ae94b17939b4f10de9a61c27766a59

Typography and layout

Legible text, hierarchy, and composition

Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Luma UNI 1 Max. Provider fal.ai, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.102000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), model ID luma/agent/uni-1/v1/max, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:40 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Flex. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-flex, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:01 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Luma UNI 1 Max, image SHA 256: d2a6162d544def0a283ed62f939b33252636d296a21142111851ecdedd2989d3

Luma UNI 1 Max, request SHA 256: 31b38cf7833b7ed265ab47297533faea410b463cf427ee9c8bfc269ed47d0ddb

FLUX.2 Flex, image SHA 256: 324f87bf898593446a400abb43bd00eee015fa0a1dc160db0f864402fc0b38af

FLUX.2 Flex, request SHA 256: a0aa716f2a302bdfa59820d2e2c27cc56f730e8e2e4d5b64223d29a6979e1475

How to read this comparison

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

A higher arena score means this specific configuration was preferred more often in blind comparisons.

Typography, character consistency, local execution, licensing, and price may matter more to your workload than overall visual appeal.

Prices cover 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels using settings documented by Artificial Analysis. Subscriptions and special rates are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Luma UNI 1 Max and FLUX.2 Flex with other important image models using the same benchmark and sample methodology.

View the complete image model comparison

Luma UNI 1 Max vs. FLUX.2 Flex

Change image model selection

General specifications and task-specific pricing

Shared capability benchmarks

Shared arena benchmarks

Sample images

Character and detail

Infographic

Product photography

Typography and layout

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

Related image model comparisons