Kling Image 3.0 Omnivs.FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

Which one is better?

In our own test both are on par. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

Kling Image 3.0 Omni: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run — Kling Image 3.0 Omni77 out of 100

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run — FLUX.1 Kontext [max]25 out of 100

Result for “Typography and layout”:Kling Image 3.0 Omni ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Kling Image 3.0 Omni: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Kling Omni 3, resolution 1K, single result, estimated cost $0.028000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:29 PM. Source

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=2413815648, Fal schema has no resolution field; official 1:1 example returns 1024x1024, estimated cost $0.080000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:03 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Kling Image 3.0 Omni image SHA 256: 5d326e157b4f3f7c54252761c0e49395f8e32244ba86f2e45d13eae353a9e807

FLUX.1 Kontext [max] image SHA 256: 11ac5858ed56d1db44139faebd83b9aa3e13fb9e8cadd6748d4bfc9a20a7b85b

Infographic

Kling Image 3.0 Omni: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Kling Omni 3, resolution 1K, single result, estimated cost $0.028000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:30 PM. Source

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=372152929, Fal schema has no resolution field; official 1:1 example returns 1024x1024, estimated cost $0.080000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:03 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Kling Image 3.0 Omni image SHA 256: e0ee4fab714481cc883130b588f90261b6acc24ff9da0f9e462e0ed6aafd1232

FLUX.1 Kontext [max] image SHA 256: cf1d34943829e1361560aee05277bb096e19399f7d231ee114ba1e6d3a865787

Product photography

Kling Image 3.0 Omni: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Kling Omni 3, resolution 1K, single result, estimated cost $0.028000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:29 PM. Source

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=314349008, Fal schema has no resolution field; official 1:1 example returns 1024x1024, estimated cost $0.080000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:03 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Kling Image 3.0 Omni image SHA 256: b4d821252e19e1b7da304679af6a70353323cec9c80d36a769aaba1225b9274e

FLUX.1 Kontext [max] image SHA 256: 85f361575b24f97fc43e88b3fdc8e6c12fb1077d95f11d1704447222bac13f59

Typography and layout

Kling Image 3.0 Omni: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Kling Omni 3, resolution 1K, single result, estimated cost $0.028000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:29 PM. Source

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=4136483547, Fal schema has no resolution field; official 1:1 example returns 1024x1024, estimated cost $0.080000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:02 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Kling Image 3.0 Omni image SHA 256: a9ab0938f07d6478dcbfd9f39e8dd17b8a5fe6216dfd4195789095cb6a6b9439

FLUX.1 Kontext [max] image SHA 256: f0591cb9970c7608e7bf3a52c32c88301b622673e3c250fd9dd41d32e1673f1c

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better

n/a

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

not in the arena

n/a

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

Rank 53 of 74

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

Rank 65 of 74

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better

n/a

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

no API price

n/a

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

no API price

Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

Subscription: n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API: No API price known. Access: API.
Weights: unknown.

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

Subscription: No Black Forest Labs subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €12.78 a month (Leonardo.Ai Essential). 15 plans in Germany.
Via API: No API price known. Access: API.
Weights: unknown.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

Kennzahl	Kling Image 3.0 Omni	FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better	n/a	n/a
Arena rank	n/a	n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating	n/a	n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100	38	22
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition	77	25
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details	22	9
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency	35	9
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization	18	44
API price
Per imagelower is better	n/a	n/a
100 images	n/a	n/a
Profile
Released	Feb 5, 2026	n/a
Weightsopen means: runs locally	unknown	unknown
Lifecycle	no notice	Edit-first model line; API also supports image creation from text, but the main GraduallyBench tasks are not edit-based
Access	API	API
Parameters	not published	not published
Largest output	4K	not consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model	n/a	15

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: Kling Image 3.0 Omni model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · FLUX.1 Kontext [max] model source, status source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Kling Image 3.0 Omni and FLUX.1 Kontext [max] from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

Compare another matchup

First image modelSecond image model

More matchups

Compare Kling Image 3.0 Omni and FLUX.1 Kontext [max] with other important image models.

View the complete image model comparison

Same prompt, two images

The numbers at a glance

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

All data side by side

Arena ratings by category

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

Compare another matchup

Related image model comparisons