Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Ideogram 4.0 vs. Grok Imagine Image 2.0

Compare shared capability tests, arena scores with documented retrieval dates, task-specific image pricing, and verified specifications. Research benchmarks, preference arenas, and our n = 1 samples remain separate.

shared result series
1
shared sample prompts
0
latest arena retrieval
2026-09-22

Change image model selection

Specifications and cost

General specifications and task-specific pricing

A model can have one price for generating new images and another for editing. Prices therefore remain tied to the corresponding arena configuration.

Specifications and pricing for Ideogram 4.0 and Grok Imagine Image 2.0
AttributeIdeogram 4.0Grok Imagine Image 2.0
ProviderIdeogramxAI
ReleasedJune 2026August 7, 2026
AccessAPI, Web app, localAPI, Web app
LifecycleNo separate lifecycle noticeNo separate lifecycle notice
WeightsOpen weightsProprietary
Parameters9.3 billionNot published
Maximum output2K2K
Arena configurationStandardNo separate configuration named
Text-to-image price$60 per 1,000 images$60 per 1,000 images
Editing priceNo arena entry$60 per 1,000 images
Technical sourceModel sourceVerified 2026-08-15Model sourceVerified 2026-09-28
Ideogram 4.0Grok Imagine Image 2.0
Text to Image ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels
Ideogram 4.0Tie$60
Grok Imagine Image 2.0Tie$60

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Prompt adherence and specialist tests

Shared capability benchmarks

These exact checkpoints have not both completed the fixed Gradually sample protocol. Earlier checkpoints do not substitute for them. No exact shared result from the integrated research benchmarks is available for this pair.

No shared Gradually ranking yet

A score appears only after both exact checkpoints complete all four fixed prompts and the same blind evaluation.

Independent preference tests

Shared arena benchmarks

Artificial Analysis and Arena derive scores from blind comparisons. Raters see outputs for the same prompt and choose the image they prefer. Separate series cover text rendering, photorealism, portraits, art, commercial design, and image editing. Confidence intervals indicate how certain a measured lead is.

1 shared result series
Ideogram 4.0Grok Imagine Image 2.0
Text to Image ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Ideogram 4.01,004 Elo
Grok Imagine Image 2.0Higher score1,157 Elo

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Arena benchmark scores for Ideogram 4.0 and Grok Imagine Image 2.0
BenchmarkIdeogram 4.0Grok Imagine Image 2.0Source
Text to Image Arena
1,004 Elo
Rank 38, 95% confidence interval: ±8, 9,609 ratings
Higher score1,157 Elo
Rank 4, 95% confidence interval: ±11, 6,270 ratings
Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-09-22

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Visual comparison

Sample images

Our images complement preference data, but do not replace it. The prompt, request count, and selection rule match. Provider resolution, quality tier, randomness, and prompt processing remain visible limitations, so this is not a fully controlled laboratory test.

No shared documented run yet

The fixed test suite covers typography, product photography, character details, and an infographic. A prompt appears only after both models have a verifiable first run.

Missing image run for Grok Imagine Image 2.0

Missing prompts. Typography and layout, Product photography, Character and detail, Infographic.

No results with the four fixed test prompts are available for this model yet.

Next step. Run the four fixed prompts with this model, archive the first outputs, and evaluate them blind.

Documentation

How to read this comparison

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

A higher arena score means this specific configuration was preferred more often in blind comparisons.

Typography, character consistency, local execution, licensing, and price may matter more to your workload than overall visual appeal.

Prices cover 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels using settings documented by Artificial Analysis. Subscriptions and special rates are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Ideogram 4.0 and Grok Imagine Image 2.0 with other important image models under the same evidence rules. Each page shows only exact shared measurements and samples.

View the complete image model comparison