- Home
- Image model comparison
- GPT Image 1.5 vs. Nano Banana Pro
GPT Image 1.5vs.Nano Banana Pro
Which one is better?
In our own test both are on par. In the arena, Nano Banana Pro leads. Both are in the lower half there, though. Both cost about the same per image.
Test images
Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.


Result for “Character and detail”:GPT Image 1.5 ahead
What the rating looks at: Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Test protocol of the images
Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.
Character and detail
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:17 PM. Source
Nano Banana Pro: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:20 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 0dff52ccd39400ac66ac8870c9ea937512ff1474688e70118688f420c38c2296
Nano Banana Pro image SHA 256: eed53dcc080d2710e6e890382f6273382a12e2c5b079b8813962bff0c92b5df7
Infographic
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:17 PM. Source
Nano Banana Pro: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:20 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 1c9ff59c32621c8b48b002dacb0ae66487262280c7c0a5b3d6456c81b248ebe9
Nano Banana Pro image SHA 256: 4ff7d3965d18e197f00647c35d6aed5a86a376c92779ee9e748c598aebafa51d
Product photography
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:16 PM. Source
Nano Banana Pro: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:19 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 67cfa2f324447027ceb5f82e9446d40a1395b46ce425890a74606b4d97731cf6
Nano Banana Pro image SHA 256: d50770f426cac7920c9ffdaf210db2f11cdc51a8cf0b7ef52e6cd26850b1de70
Typography and layout
GPT Image 1.5: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 1:59 PM. Source
Nano Banana Pro: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:00 PM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419
GPT Image 1.5 image SHA 256: 6a4cec86850fd371b65274198e2bf630b3cf36a096f9fb953d4bfe17c3222ebe
Nano Banana Pro image SHA 256: fc173de00b0df04772321167cfeabb55418d3d016081e7ebfb589c69a629b712
The numbers at a glance
GPT Image 1.5
Rank 13 of 21
Nano Banana Pro
Rank 12 of 21
GPT Image 1.5
Rank 29 of 108
Nano Banana Pro
Rank 35 of 108
GPT Image 1.5
expensive
Nano Banana Pro
expensive
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
GPT Image 1.5
- Subscription
- No OpenAI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €6.36 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 42 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- $0.13 per image, 100 images $13.30.
Nano Banana Pro
- Subscription
- At Google from €4.99 a month (Google AI Plus, with limited credits). Through other providers from ≈ €6.36 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 79 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- $0.13 per image, 100 images $13.40.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Nov 6, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · API prices from Nov 6, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | GPT Image 1.5 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | 1,236 | 1,246 |
| Arena rank | Rank 13 of 21 | Rank 12 of 21 |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | 173,798 | 191,257 |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 68 | 66 |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 60 | 92 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 52 | 70 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 89 | 37 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 72 | 65 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | $0.13 | $0.13 |
| 100 images | $13.30 | $13.40 |
| Profile | ||
| Released | December 2025 | November 2025 |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | proprietary | proprietary |
| Lifecycle | Marked as deprecated by OpenAI; removed from the API on December 1, 2026 | no notice |
| Access | API, Web app | API, Web app |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 1,536 × 1,024 pixels | 4K |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 42 | 79 |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: GPT Image 1.5 model source, status source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · Nano Banana Pro model source (verified Aug 15, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
Artificial Analysis from Nov 6, 2026 · LMArena from Nov 6, 2026
All individual values with sources
| Rating | GPT Image 1.5 | Nano Banana Pro | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text to Image Arena | 1,124 | 1,119 | Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Image Editing Arena | 1,116 | 1,109 | Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: 3D modeling | 1,218 | 1,232 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Agentic image generation | 1,237 | 1,237 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Art | 1,225 | 1,224 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Cartoon | 1,244 | 1,244 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Commercial design | 1,238 | 1,245 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Overall | 1,236 | 1,246 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Photorealism | 1,247 | 1,260 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Portraits | 1,259 | 1,256 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Text rendering | 1,251 | 1,270 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Agentic image generation | 1,360 | 1,405 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Multi-image editing | 1,342 | 1,363 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Agentic multi-image editing | 1,359 | 1,386 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Overall | 1,368 | 1,390 | LMArenaRetrieved Nov 6, 2026 |
Published specialist tests
This pair shares 60 results from published research benchmarks.
GenExam from Aug 26, 2026 · Qwen Image Bench from Aug 26, 2026 · WISE Verified from Aug 26, 2026 · GRADE from Aug 26, 2026 · GEBench from Aug 26, 2026 · Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model card from Aug 26, 2026
All individual values with sources
| Rating | GPT Image 1.5 | Nano Banana Pro | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| GenExam Mathematics, strict | 27% | 56% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Physics, strict | 46% | 75% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Chemistry, strict | 39% | 60% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Biology, strict | 56% | 76% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Geography, strict | 61% | 76% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Computer science, strict | 36% | 66% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Engineering, strict | 44% | 71% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Economics, strict | 43% | 88% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Music, strict | 29% | 62% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam History, strict | 51% | 98% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam overall, strict | 43% | 73% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Mathematics, relaxed | 66% | 86% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Physics, relaxed | 85% | 95% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Chemistry, relaxed | 78% | 89% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Biology, relaxed | 92% | 96% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Geography, relaxed | 93% | 97% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Computer science, relaxed | 76% | 92% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Engineering, relaxed | 86% | 95% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Economics, relaxed | 86% | 97% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam Music, relaxed | 71% | 91% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam History, relaxed | 91% | 100% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenExam overall, relaxed | 82% | 94% | GenExamRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench quality | 55 / 100 | 56 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench aesthetics | 61 / 100 | 60 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench alignment | 62 / 100 | 61 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench real-world fidelity | 54 / 100 | 54 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench creative generation | 66 / 100 | 66 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Qwen Image Bench overall | 60 / 100 | 59 / 100 | Qwen Image BenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| WISE Verified overall | 83% | 88% | WISE VerifiedRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| WISE culture | 89% | 90% | WISE VerifiedRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| WISE time | 69% | 82% | WISE VerifiedRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| WISE space | 88% | 93% | WISE VerifiedRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| WISE biology | 80% | 82% | WISE VerifiedRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| WISE physics | 76% | 87% | WISE VerifiedRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| WISE chemistry | 78% | 88% | WISE VerifiedRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GRADE reasoning | 55 / 100 | 78 / 100 | GRADERetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GRADE consistency | 82 / 100 | 90 / 100 | GRADERetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GRADE readability | 91 / 100 | 96 / 100 | GRADERetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GRADE accuracy | 16 / 100 | 46 / 100 | GRADERetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench Chinese, single-step | 84 / 100 | 85 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench Chinese, multi-step | 57 / 100 | 69 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench Chinese, fictional app | 60 / 100 | 66 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench Chinese, real app | 56 / 100 | 64 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench Chinese, grounding | 53 / 100 | 65 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench Chinese, overall | 63 / 100 | 70 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench English, single-step | 81 / 100 | 84 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench English, multi-step | 59 / 100 | 70 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench English, fictional app | 64 / 100 | 46 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench English, real app | 59 / 100 | 47 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench English, grounding | 49 / 100 | 59 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GEBench English, overall | 63 / 100 | 61 / 100 | GEBenchRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenAI-Bench overall preference | 1,047 | 1,021 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| GenAI-Bench visual quality | 975 | 1,043 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Infographics factuality | 985 | 1,102 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| General image editing | 995 | 1,051 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Character editing | 1,025 | 1,050 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Creative editing | 1,017 | 1,004 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Object and environment editing | 976 | 1,042 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Editing with 1-3 input images | 1,014 | 1,056 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
| Stylization | 996 | 1,045 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardRetrieved Aug 26, 2026 |
More comparisons
Compare GPT Image 1.5 and Nano Banana Pro with the models people compare them with most often.