Skip to main content

FLUX.2 Provs.Muse Image

Which one is better?

In our own test both are on par. In the arena, Muse Image leads. Muse Image costs only a third per image.

Test images

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

FLUX.2 Pro: Infographic, first image from the fixed test run
FLUX.2 Pro45 out of 100
Muse Image: Infographic, first image from the fixed test run
Muse Image86 out of 100

Result for “Infographic”:Muse Image ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

What the rating looks at: Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

FLUX.2 Pro: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:30 PM. Source

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

FLUX.2 Pro image SHA 256: 9eec1a6900b6031703d2e797b93c2aba6c5f45b4807b560a0bf1e37eac9e20f2

Muse Image image SHA 256: 356427fe1ec15a444aae4eab2194344c7fe6b17ef205a8db16c1d64dbacb750e

Infographic

FLUX.2 Pro: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:31 PM. Source

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

FLUX.2 Pro image SHA 256: ea47f772cdfa26bf21528ae7e09d245eb7a3be7d3185af15cedd7d21acdfbb09

Muse Image image SHA 256: c8b096001990f57cb5225f6387485b391a4a5e3c3031e7b0524a4c19e1e01bc8

Product photography

FLUX.2 Pro: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:30 PM. Source

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

FLUX.2 Pro image SHA 256: 4d9b922f59b329c5ac3532222c8e340e7fdcb1920ce6f03ad9299f25a6beec43

Muse Image image SHA 256: 0cb5d4c3dbe33c840ba87f0e8af255deec9e7e02eb6c7f172310af433e78fdb6

Typography and layout

FLUX.2 Pro: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:02 PM. Source

Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

FLUX.2 Pro image SHA 256: 5a5d8ccd657d7522bc39fdec4b0aecf198b42c282a5aefde9461239dfe5c0396

Muse Image image SHA 256: b8232890082d6bdd72dd7be99d98a573566a2c62f94597ecdda2bd9110e2e143

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better
1,153

FLUX.2 Pro

Rank 17 of 21

1,269

Muse Image

Rank 7 of 21

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
65

FLUX.2 Pro

Rank 41 of 108

78

Muse Image

Rank 4 of 108

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better
$0.03

FLUX.2 Pro

cheap

$0.01

Muse Image

cheap

Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

FLUX.2 Pro

Subscription
No Black Forest Labs subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €6.34 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 43 plans in Germany.
Via API
$0.03 per image, 100 images $3.

Muse Image

Subscription
Free to use at Meta (Meta AI Free). Through other providers from ≈ €9.51 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 6 plans in Germany.
Via API
$0.01 per image, 100 images $1.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

Arena rating (LMArena) from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · API prices from Nov 3, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

KennzahlFLUX.2 ProMuse Image
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better1,1531,269
Arena rankRank 17 of 21Rank 7 of 21
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating223,17953,444
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 1006578
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition6986
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details5881
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency8761
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization4586
API price
Per imagelower is better$0.03$0.01
100 images$3$1
Profile
ReleasedNovember 2025Jul 7, 2026
Weightsopen means: runs locallyproprietaryproprietary
AccessAPI, Web appAPI, Web app
Parametersnot publishednot published
Largest output4 Megapixelnot consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model436

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: FLUX.2 Pro model source (verified Sep 24, 2026) · Muse Image model source (verified Sep 26, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

Arena rating per categoryfrom votes by users · higher is betterFLUX.2 ProMuse Image
Text to Image ArenaFLUX.2 Pro: 1,003Muse Image: 1,127Muse Image ahead
Image Editing ArenaFLUX.2 Pro: 1,013Muse Image: 1,129Muse Image ahead
Text to Image: 3D modelingFLUX.2 Pro: 1,145Muse Image: 1,239Muse Image ahead
Text to Image: Agentic image generationFLUX.2 Pro: 1,137Muse Image: 1,236Muse Image ahead
Text to Image: ArtFLUX.2 Pro: 1,159Muse Image: 1,258Muse Image ahead
Text to Image: CartoonFLUX.2 Pro: 1,159Muse Image: 1,276Muse Image ahead
Text to Image: Commercial designFLUX.2 Pro: 1,154Muse Image: 1,259Muse Image ahead
Text to Image: OverallFLUX.2 Pro: 1,153Muse Image: 1,269Muse Image ahead
Text to Image: PhotorealismFLUX.2 Pro: 1,151Muse Image: 1,281Muse Image ahead
Text to Image: PortraitsFLUX.2 Pro: 1,144Muse Image: 1,294Muse Image ahead
Text to Image: Text renderingFLUX.2 Pro: 1,155Muse Image: 1,293Muse Image ahead
Image Editing: Agentic image generationFLUX.2 Pro: 1,216Muse Image: 1,393Muse Image ahead
Image Editing: Multi-image editingFLUX.2 Pro: 1,240Muse Image: 1,399Muse Image ahead
Image Editing: Agentic multi-image editingFLUX.2 Pro: 1,189Muse Image: 1,415Muse Image ahead
Image Editing: OverallFLUX.2 Pro: 1,247Muse Image: 1,400Muse Image ahead

Artificial Analysis from Nov 3, 2026 · LMArena from Oct 28, 2026

All individual values with sources
RatingFLUX.2 ProMuse ImageSource
Text to Image Arena1,0031,127Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 3, 2026
Image Editing Arena1,0131,129Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 3, 2026
Text to Image: 3D modeling1,1451,239LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Text to Image: Agentic image generation1,1371,236LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Text to Image: Art1,1591,258LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Text to Image: Cartoon1,1591,276LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Text to Image: Commercial design1,1541,259LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Text to Image: Overall1,1531,269LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Text to Image: Photorealism1,1511,281LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Text to Image: Portraits1,1441,294LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Text to Image: Text rendering1,1551,293LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Image Editing: Agentic image generation1,2161,393LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Image Editing: Multi-image editing1,2401,399LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Image Editing: Agentic multi-image editing1,1891,415LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026
Image Editing: Overall1,2471,400LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026

More comparisons with FLUX.2 Pro and Muse Image

Compare FLUX.2 Pro and Muse Image with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

Predecessor and successor

  • FLUX.2 Pro has no successor yet
  • No predecessor recorded for Muse Image
  • Muse Image has no successor yet