- Home
- Image model comparison
- FLUX.2 Max vs. Muse Image
FLUX.2 Maxvs.Muse Image
Which one is better?
In our own test both are on par. In the arena, Muse Image leads. FLUX.2 Max costs 7.0 times as much per image.
Test images
Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.


Result for “Infographic”:Muse Image ahead
What the rating looks at: Numbers, labels, and visual organization.
“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.
Test protocol of the images
Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.
Character and detail
FLUX.2 Max: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, steps=50, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:23 PM. Source
Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6
FLUX.2 Max image SHA 256: a0a2cef301582c47a8dca69ccd1c52212c37ca6c058d7185a880a7856713cd9e
Muse Image image SHA 256: 356427fe1ec15a444aae4eab2194344c7fe6b17ef205a8db16c1d64dbacb750e
Infographic
FLUX.2 Max: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, steps=50, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:24 PM. Source
Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:49 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f
FLUX.2 Max image SHA 256: 9321457355d5a9630073632fb6441bf388da1c4ee8e5d58e58cd0603ce756a09
Muse Image image SHA 256: c8b096001990f57cb5225f6387485b391a4a5e3c3031e7b0524a4c19e1e01bc8
Product photography
FLUX.2 Max: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, steps=50, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:23 PM. Source
Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3
FLUX.2 Max image SHA 256: dd6ad8d1ec45154727d9ddf573ef10da5225899820055318d23bcd4e5a1e930c
Muse Image image SHA 256: 0cb5d4c3dbe33c840ba87f0e8af255deec9e7e02eb6c7f172310af433e78fdb6
Typography and layout
FLUX.2 Max: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, steps=50, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:00 PM. Source
Muse Image: fal, aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.010000, source 1600x1600, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 8:48 AM. Source
Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419
FLUX.2 Max image SHA 256: 3eb2daf01c749ee25d86c2e4f55d6d3d81cfb4590eb0343f9a4bb3d0a70d19bc
Muse Image image SHA 256: b8232890082d6bdd72dd7be99d98a573566a2c62f94597ecdda2bd9110e2e143
The numbers at a glance
FLUX.2 Max
Rank 15 of 21
Muse Image
Rank 7 of 21
FLUX.2 Max
Rank 27 of 108
Muse Image
Rank 4 of 108
FLUX.2 Max
fairly expensive
Muse Image
cheap
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
FLUX.2 Max
- Subscription
- No Black Forest Labs subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €6.83 a month (Poe Basic, with limited points). 28 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- $0.07 per image, 100 images $7.
Muse Image
- Subscription
- Free to use at Meta (Meta AI Free). Through other providers from ≈ €9.51 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 6 plans in Germany.
- Via API
- $0.01 per image, 100 images $1.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
Arena rating (LMArena) from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · API prices from Nov 3, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | FLUX.2 Max | Muse Image |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | 1,161 | 1,269 |
| Arena rank | Rank 15 of 21 | Rank 7 of 21 |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | 123,144 | 53,444 |
| GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 | 69 | 78 |
| GraduallyBench by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 92 | 86 |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 59 | 81 |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 70 | 61 |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 54 | 86 |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | $0.07 | $0.01 |
| 100 images | $7 | $1 |
| Profile | ||
| Released | December 2025 | Jul 7, 2026 |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | proprietary | proprietary |
| Access | API, Web app | API, Web app |
| Parameters | not published | not published |
| Largest output | 4 Megapixel | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | 28 | 6 |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: FLUX.2 Max model source (verified Sep 24, 2026) · Muse Image model source (verified Sep 26, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
Artificial Analysis from Nov 3, 2026 · LMArena from Oct 28, 2026
All individual values with sources
| Rating | FLUX.2 Max | Muse Image | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text to Image Arena | 1,021 | 1,127 | Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 3, 2026 |
| Image Editing Arena | 999 | 1,129 | Artificial AnalysisRetrieved Nov 3, 2026 |
| Text to Image: 3D modeling | 1,160 | 1,239 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Art | 1,169 | 1,258 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Cartoon | 1,167 | 1,276 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Commercial design | 1,164 | 1,259 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Overall | 1,161 | 1,269 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Photorealism | 1,161 | 1,281 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Portraits | 1,157 | 1,294 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
| Text to Image: Text rendering | 1,165 | 1,293 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Multi-image editing | 1,249 | 1,399 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
| Image Editing: Overall | 1,261 | 1,400 | LMArenaRetrieved Oct 28, 2026 |
More comparisons with FLUX.2 Max and Muse Image
Compare FLUX.2 Max and Muse Image with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
- No predecessor recorded for FLUX.2 Max
- FLUX.2 Max has no successor yet
- No predecessor recorded for Muse Image
- Muse Image has no successor yet
The most popular comparisons
- 1FLUX.2 Max vs. FLUX.2 Pro
- 2Nano Banana 2 vs. FLUX.2 Max
- 3FLUX.2 Max vs. Krea 2 Large
- 4Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. Muse Image
- 5FLUX.2 Max vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large
- 6FLUX.2 Max vs. Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
- 7Krea 2 Large vs. Muse Image
- 8GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs. FLUX.2 Max
- 9FLUX.2 Max vs. Qwen-Image-2.1