Skip to main content

FLUX.2 Maxvs.HUMAIN Image 1

Which one is better?

We have not tested HUMAIN Image 1 ourselves yet. HUMAIN Image 1 has no arena rating yet. HUMAIN Image 1 has no API price.

Same prompt, two images

Same task, the first image of each.

FLUX.2 Max: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run
FLUX.2 Max68 out of 100

No image from the four fixed tasks for HUMAIN Image 1 yet.The product photo is archived. The provider rejected the other three fixed prompts without image output on November 1, 2026. This is not a complete GraduallyBench run.

HUMAIN Image 1not tested yet

Result for “Typography and layout”:only FLUX.2 Max tested

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Missing image run for HUMAIN Image 1

The product photo is archived. The provider rejected the other three fixed prompts without image output on November 1, 2026. This is not a complete GraduallyBench run. Revisit the rejected original prompts once the provider restriction is clarified. Do not substitute prompts or assign an overall score.

Documentation
Test protocol of the images

Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Product photography

FLUX.2 Max: together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, steps=50, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:23 PM. Source

HUMAIN Image 1: manual, 1:1, one request, first output (first top-left candidate of native batch), exact UI model HUMAIN Image 1, provider-default random seed, native resolution provider default, fast mode not offered, no reference images, no selected effects, default content settings, source UI file Firefly_Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing 760597.png, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 1, 2026, 10:31 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

FLUX.2 Max image SHA 256: dd6ad8d1ec45154727d9ddf573ef10da5225899820055318d23bcd4e5a1e930c

HUMAIN Image 1 image SHA 256: 4d45419d95ecd756be5e28816ca0b3d376c491685225f3602a61ec45c1476fff

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better
1,161

FLUX.2 Max

Rank 16 of 22

n/a

HUMAIN Image 1

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
63

FLUX.2 Max

Rank 20 of 74

n/a

HUMAIN Image 1

not tested yet

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better
$0.07

FLUX.2 Max

fairly expensive

n/a

HUMAIN Image 1

no API price

Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

FLUX.2 Max

Subscription
No Black Forest Labs subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €6.83 a month (Poe Basic, with limited points). 28 plans in Germany.
Via API
$0.07 per image, 100 images $7.

HUMAIN Image 1

Subscription
No HUMAIN subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €10.98 a month (Adobe Firefly Standard, with limited credits). 7 plans in Germany.
Via API
No API price known. Access: Web app.
Weights
unknown.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

Arena rating (LMArena) from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · API prices from Oct 28, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

KennzahlFLUX.2 MaxHUMAIN Image 1
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better1,161n/a
Arena rankRank 16 of 22n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating123,144n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 10063n/a
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition68n/a
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details52n/a
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency85n/a
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization48n/a
API price
Per imagelower is better$0.07n/a
100 images$7n/a
Profile
ReleasedDecember 2025n/a
Weightsopen means: runs locallyproprietaryunknown
AccessAPI, Web appWeb app
Parametersnot publishednot published
Largest output4 Megapixelnot consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model287

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: FLUX.2 Max model source (verified Sep 24, 2026) · HUMAIN Image 1 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for FLUX.2 Max and HUMAIN Image 1 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

Compare another matchup

More matchups

Related image model comparisons

Compare FLUX.2 Max and HUMAIN Image 1 with other important image models.

View the complete image model comparison