Skip to main content

FLUX.2 Klein 4Bvs.Lumina-Image 2.0

Which one is better?

In our own test, FLUX.2 Klein 4B leads. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.

Same prompt, two images

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

FLUX.2 Klein 4B: Product photography, first image from the fixed test run
FLUX.2 Klein 4B54 out of 100
Lumina-Image 2.0: Product photography, first image from the fixed test run
Lumina-Image 2.04 out of 100

Result for “Product photography”:FLUX.2 Klein 4B ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

What the rating looks at: Materials, reflections, and fine details.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

FLUX.2 Klein 4B: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=707400387, Fal's published 4B text-to-image endpoint; default four inference steps, estimated cost $0.005000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:01 PM. Source

Lumina-Image 2.0: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.150000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:38 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

FLUX.2 Klein 4B image SHA 256: 170cebb7cf75bc033a92371199812674f9cfa9641d5e9fb13947ccf892d4ed53

Lumina-Image 2.0 image SHA 256: 8747df0401d91598486735bfff5d6bac6c139727a8bc50c60bf7f697f678b85f

Infographic

FLUX.2 Klein 4B: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=290140178, Fal's published 4B text-to-image endpoint; default four inference steps, estimated cost $0.005000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:01 PM. Source

Lumina-Image 2.0: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.150000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:38 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

FLUX.2 Klein 4B image SHA 256: 42b729a5a72207b5a92464f3ecf1713459ab1b105c3041c14b75c7622630015e

Lumina-Image 2.0 image SHA 256: b937b28f3c3209280c5828e18c85341d3ca443175020ca1e407dae035b5df14f

Product photography

FLUX.2 Klein 4B: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1254275381, Fal's published 4B text-to-image endpoint; default four inference steps, estimated cost $0.005000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:00 PM. Source

Lumina-Image 2.0: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.150000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:38 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

FLUX.2 Klein 4B image SHA 256: 8fae4a7f6abb7467281c439dc93aa656031626f88c8a54f95f49850cbf045580

Lumina-Image 2.0 image SHA 256: 74b79fcbad7565e29995c941d2b488d2edde884b307ed99e47fad994424e9dfc

Typography and layout

FLUX.2 Klein 4B: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1270698692, Fal's published 4B text-to-image endpoint; default four inference steps, estimated cost $0.005000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:00 PM. Source

Lumina-Image 2.0: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, estimated cost $0.150000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:37 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

FLUX.2 Klein 4B image SHA 256: 7c2c3e30c20c98e90033087b2b95b151bddc3252dd4aed7092fcbca4ae4ea96e

Lumina-Image 2.0 image SHA 256: f132c159d659fb76c94cd82f1decb617c475b9c4095b177d02b73f09f2954df0

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better
n/a

FLUX.2 Klein 4B

not in the arena

n/a

Lumina-Image 2.0

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
37

FLUX.2 Klein 4B

Rank 55 of 74

7

Lumina-Image 2.0

Rank 72 of 74

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better
n/a

FLUX.2 Klein 4B

no API price

n/a

Lumina-Image 2.0

no API price

Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

FLUX.2 Klein 4B

Subscription
No Black Forest Labs subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €6.83 a month (Poe Basic, with limited points). 12 plans in Germany.
Via API
No API price known. Access: API, local.
License
Open weights.

Lumina-Image 2.0

Subscription
n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API
No API price known. Access: local.
License
Open weights.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

KennzahlFLUX.2 Klein 4BLumina-Image 2.0
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is bettern/an/a
Arena rankn/an/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer ratingn/an/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100377
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition211
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details544
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency5317
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization196
API price
Per imagelower is bettern/an/a
100 imagesn/an/a
Profile
Releasedn/aJan 25, 2025
Weightsopen means: runs locallyopenopen
AccessAPI, locallocal
Parameters4 billion2.6 billion
Largest outputnot consistently publishednot consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model12n/a

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: FLUX.2 Klein 4B model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · Lumina-Image 2.0 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for FLUX.2 Klein 4B and Lumina-Image 2.0 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

Compare another matchup

More matchups

Related image model comparisons

Compare FLUX.2 Klein 4B and Lumina-Image 2.0 with other important image models.

View the complete image model comparison