- Home
- Image model comparison
- Bria FIBO Lite vs. NextStep-1.1
BriaStepFunImage model matchup
Bria FIBO Litevs.NextStep-1.1
Which one is better?
We have not tested NextStep-1.1 ourselves yet. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.
Bria FIBO Lite
Rank 73 of 108
NextStep-1.1
not tested yet
Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench Image v2 run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.
Test images from GraduallyBench Image v2
Same task, the first image of each.

No image from the four fixed tasks for NextStep-1.1 yet.
Result for “Typography and layout”:only Bria FIBO Lite tested
What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.
“Ahead”: the 95 % ranges of both values do not overlap. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but the ranges overlap.
Missing image run for NextStep-1.1
The reviewed official text-to-image runner generates 512 × 512 pixels. A verified route to at least 1,024 × 1,024 native pixels without external upscaling is missing. The documented CUDA execution is also unavailable on this Mac. Last checked November 2, 2026. Verify a route to the exact version with native resolution that meets the protocol.
DocumentationSubscription and API
Bria FIBO Lite
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: API).
- Weights
- Unknown.
NextStep-1.1
- Subscription
- n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
- Via API
- No API price known (access: local).
- Weights
- Open weights.
Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.
GraduallyBench Image v2 from Nov 7, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (45 days old)
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.
| Kennzahl | Bria FIBO Lite | NextStep-1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better | n/a | n/a |
| Arena rank | n/a | n/a |
| Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating | n/a | n/a |
| GraduallyBench Image v2our own benchmark, 0 to 100 | 36 | n/a |
| GraduallyBench Image v2 by task | ||
| Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition | 29 | n/a |
| Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details | 45 | n/a |
| Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency | 52 | n/a |
| InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization | 16 | n/a |
| API price | ||
| Per imagelower is better | n/a | n/a |
| 100 images | n/a | n/a |
| Profile | ||
| Released | n/a | Dec 24, 2025 |
| Weightsopen means: runs locally | unknown | open |
| Access | API | local |
| Parameters | not published | 15 billion |
| Largest output | not consistently published | not consistently published |
| Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model | n/a | n/a |
API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.
Sources: Bria FIBO Lite model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · NextStep-1.1 model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)
Arena ratings by category
From blind votes on Artificial Analysis and LMArena; the sources are named under the card. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.
No shared arena score in the stored snapshot
The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for Bria FIBO Lite and NextStep-1.1 from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.