Skip to main content

Fastino LabsDecision matchup

GLiNER2.5-Decide-1Bvs.GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide

Which model makes better decisions?

GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B does better in independent tests, while GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide is much smaller.

Independent tests
GLiNER2.5-Decide-1Bahead1 of 1
GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide0 of 1
BKS-Lab lab-bench route1 score table
Popularity
GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B34
GLiNER2.5-multi-Decideahead45
out of 100
Weights and access
GLiNER2.5-Decide-1Bopen, local
GLiNER2.5-multi-Decideopen, local
Size
GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B1 B
GLiNER2.5-multi-Decidesmaller0.29 B
Parameters

Pick GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B for

BKS-Lab lab-bench route1 score table

Pick GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide for

smallermore popular

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

BKS-Lab lab-bench route1 score table

GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B ahead

GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B is clearly ahead in 8 of 32 subtests and slightly in 10, GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide in 4 clearly and slightly in 6. 4 are level.

MASSIVE 1.1 test, scenario classification, de, prompt mode, accuracy

GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B41.1 %
GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide48.5 %

2,974 tasks, as of October 24, 2026

MASSIVE 1.1 test, scenario classification, de, intext mode, accuracy

GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B40.2 %
GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide46.7 %

2,974 tasks, as of October 24, 2026

MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification, 2+ options, de, intext mode, accuracy

GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B51.0 %
GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide58.4 %

2,622 tasks, as of October 24, 2026

Show all 32 subtests
SubtestGLiNER2.5-Decide-1BGLiNER2.5-multi-DecideVerdict
MASSIVE 1.1 test, scenario classification, de, prompt mode, accuracy41.1 %48.5 %GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, scenario classification, de, intext mode, accuracy40.2 %46.7 %GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification, 2+ options, de, intext mode, accuracy51.0 %58.4 %GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification, 2+ options, en, prompt mode, accuracy72.4 %63.7 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification (gold-scenario oracle), de, intext mode, accuracy56.8 %63.3 %GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification (gold-scenario oracle), en, prompt mode, accuracy75.7 %68.0 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B ahead
Fast-Decisions dev, tasks with 26 or fewer options, en, intext mode, accuracy64.4 %58.0 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B ahead
Fast-Decisions dev, all single-label tasks, en, intext mode, accuracy64.6 %58.2 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B ahead
Fast-Decisions dev, tasks with 26 or fewer options, en, prompt mode, accuracy63.4 %57.7 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B ahead
Fast-Decisions dev, all single-label tasks, en, prompt mode, accuracy63.5 %58.0 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification, 2+ options, en, intext mode, accuracy67.4 %64.1 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification (gold-scenario oracle), en, intext mode, accuracy71.2 %68.3 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification, 2+ options, de, intext mode, macro-F143.4 %52.9 %GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification (gold-scenario oracle), de, intext mode, macro-F146.3 %55.3 %GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, scenario classification, de, intext mode, macro-F139.7 %46.9 %GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification, 2+ options, en, prompt mode, macro-F170.6 %60.2 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification (gold-scenario oracle), en, prompt mode, macro-F172.1 %62.2 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, scenario classification, en, prompt mode, macro-F156.8 %50.3 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, scenario classification, de, prompt mode, macro-F141.1 %46.4 %GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide slightly ahead
Fast-Decisions dev, tasks with 26 or fewer options, en, intext mode, macro-F160.4 %54.3 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B slightly ahead
Fast-Decisions dev, all single-label tasks, en, intext mode, macro-F161.1 %55.1 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, scenario classification, en, intext mode, macro-F156.6 %51.1 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B slightly ahead
Fast-Decisions dev, tasks with 26 or fewer options, en, prompt mode, macro-F159.1 %53.4 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification, 2+ options, de, prompt mode, macro-F150.7 %54.9 %GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide slightly ahead
Fast-Decisions dev, all single-label tasks, en, prompt mode, macro-F158.8 %54.4 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification (gold-scenario oracle), de, prompt mode, macro-F153.2 %57.2 %GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification, 2+ options, en, intext mode, macro-F165.3 %62.0 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification (gold-scenario oracle), en, intext mode, macro-F167.1 %63.9 %GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B slightly ahead
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification, 2+ options, de, prompt mode, accuracy56.4 %58.9 %level
MASSIVE 1.1 test, scenario classification, en, intext mode, accuracy52.3 %50.1 %level
MASSIVE 1.1 test, intent classification (gold-scenario oracle), de, prompt mode, accuracy61.6 %63.8 %level
MASSIVE 1.1 test, scenario classification, en, prompt mode, accuracy53.3 %52.0 %level

Source · latest October 24, 2026

All data side by side

GLiNER2.5-Decide-1BGLiNER2.5-multi-Decide
KindClassifierClassifier
DeveloperFastino LabsFastino Labs
StatusOpen sourceOpen source
Weightsopenopen
Runs locallyyesyes
Parameters1 B0.29 B
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Popularity (out of 100)3445

More comparisons with GLiNER2.5-Decide-1B and GLiNER2.5-multi-Decide

All decision models compared