Skip to main content

Mistral AIDeepgramAudio matchupSpeech to text

Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtimevs.Flux

Which model is better?

Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime and Flux each lead in different tests.

Independent tests
Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime0 of 3
Flux0 of 3
Coval, Vals AI, Artificial Analysis
Popularity
Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime18
Fluxahead37
out of 100
Weights and access
Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtimeopenopen, local
Fluxproprietary
Released
Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtimen/a
Fluxn/a

Pick Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime for

leaning Artificial Analysisopen weightsruns locally

Pick Flux for

leaning Covalleaning Vals AImore popular

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

Coval

Flux slightly ahead

Flux is clearly ahead in 0 of 16 subtests and slightly in 13, Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime in 0 clearly and slightly in 3.

Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p50

Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime0.0 %
Flux3.1 %

lower is better, as of November 5, 2026

Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) maximum

Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime40,858 ms
Flux4,616 ms

lower is better, as of November 5, 2026

Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) mean

Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime444 ms
Flux102 ms

lower is better, as of November 5, 2026

Show all 16 subtests
SubtestVoxtral Mini Transcribe RealtimeFluxVerdict
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p50 (lower is better)0.0 %3.1 %Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) maximum (lower is better)40,858 ms4,616 msFlux slightly ahead
Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) mean (lower is better)444 ms102 msFlux slightly ahead
Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) p50 (lower is better)339 ms99 msFlux slightly ahead
Coval RTF maximum (lower is better)15.595.29Flux slightly ahead
Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) maximum (lower is better)35,330 ms13,993 msFlux slightly ahead
Coval AudioToFinal maximum (lower is better)43.02 s17.25 sFlux slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample maximum (lower is better)191.7 %92.3 %Flux slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) mean (lower is better)1,872 ms1,095 msFlux slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) p50 (lower is better)1,846 ms1,172 msFlux slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample mean (lower is better)5.7 %6.4 %Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime slightly ahead
Coval pooled corpus Word Error Rate (WER) (lower is better)5.4 %5.7 %Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime slightly ahead
Coval RTF mean (lower is better)1.071.02Flux slightly ahead
Coval AudioToFinal mean (lower is better)8.38 s8.05 sFlux slightly ahead
Coval RTF p50 (lower is better)1.051.01Flux slightly ahead
Coval AudioToFinal p50 (lower is better)8.70 s8.42 sFlux slightly ahead

Source · latest November 5, 2026

Vals AI

Flux slightly ahead

Flux is clearly ahead in 0 of 3 subtests and slightly in 2, Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime in 0 clearly and slightly in 1.

VoiceCodeBench · WER

Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime6.6 %
Flux9.4 %

lower is better, as of October 31, 2026

VoiceCodeBench · Overall

Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime46.0 %
Flux55.7 %

as of October 31, 2026

VoiceCodeBench · CTEM

Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime83.3 %
Flux86.6 %

as of October 31, 2026

Source · latest October 31, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime slightly ahead

Artificial Analysis AA-WER Streaming (final transcription)

Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime5.2 %
Flux7.4 %

lower is better, as of October 15, 2026

Source · latest October 15, 2026

All data side by side

Prices are verbatim from the provider, because audio models bill per minute, character or token.

Voxtral Mini Transcribe RealtimeFlux
TaskSpeech to textSpeech to text
DeveloperMistral AIDeepgram
StatusActiveActive
Weightsopenproprietary
Runs locallyyesno
Popularity (out of 100)1837