Skip to main content

OpenAICartesiaAudio matchupSpeech to text

GPT-Realtime-Whispervs.Cartesia Ink-2

Which model is better?

Cartesia Ink-2 is slightly ahead in independent tests, but the lead is not certain.

Independent tests
GPT-Realtime-Whisper0 of 1
Cartesia Ink-20 of 1
Coval
Popularity
GPT-Realtime-Whisperahead34
Cartesia Ink-20
out of 100
Weights and access
GPT-Realtime-Whisperproprietary
Cartesia Ink-2proprietary
Price
GPT-Realtime-Whisper$0.017 per audio minute
Cartesia Ink-23 credits per second of audio; the dollar price and overage charges depend on the plan
verbatim from the provider

Pick GPT-Realtime-Whisper for

more popular

Pick Cartesia Ink-2 for

leaning Coval

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

Coval

Cartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead

Cartesia Ink-2 is clearly ahead in 0 of 16 subtests and slightly in 10, GPT-Realtime-Whisper in 0 clearly and slightly in 5. 1 is level.

Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) p50

GPT-Realtime-Whisper547 ms
Cartesia Ink-2139 ms

lower is better, as of November 5, 2026

Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) mean

GPT-Realtime-Whisper564 ms
Cartesia Ink-2145 ms

lower is better, as of November 5, 2026

Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) maximum

GPT-Realtime-Whisper10,968 ms
Cartesia Ink-225,200 ms

lower is better, as of November 5, 2026

Show all 16 subtests
SubtestGPT-Realtime-WhisperCartesia Ink-2Verdict
Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) p50 (lower is better)547 ms139 msCartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead
Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) mean (lower is better)564 ms145 msCartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) maximum (lower is better)10,968 ms25,200 msGPT-Realtime-Whisper slightly ahead
Coval Time to Final Segment (TTFS) maximum (lower is better)20,386 ms31,136 msGPT-Realtime-Whisper slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample maximum (lower is better)100.0 %69.0 %Cartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead
Coval AudioToFinal maximum (lower is better)30.01 s39.52 sGPT-Realtime-Whisper slightly ahead
Coval RTF maximum (lower is better)5.554.71Cartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample mean (lower is better)4.5 %3.9 %Cartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead
Coval pooled corpus Word Error Rate (WER) (lower is better)4.0 %3.4 %Cartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) mean (lower is better)1,820 ms2,033 msGPT-Realtime-Whisper slightly ahead
Coval Time to First Token (TTFT) p50 (lower is better)1,878 ms2,017 msGPT-Realtime-Whisper slightly ahead
Coval RTF mean (lower is better)1.091.02Cartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead
Coval AudioToFinal mean (lower is better)8.51 s8.09 sCartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead
Coval AudioToFinal p50 (lower is better)8.88 s8.46 sCartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead
Coval RTF p50 (lower is better)1.071.02Cartesia Ink-2 slightly ahead
Coval Word Error Rate (WER) per-sample p50 (lower is better)0.0 %0.0 %level

Source · latest November 5, 2026

All data side by side

Prices are verbatim from the provider, because audio models bill per minute, character or token.

GPT-Realtime-WhisperCartesia Ink-2
TaskSpeech to textSpeech to text
DeveloperOpenAICartesia
StatusActiveActive
Releasedn/aJuly 9, 2026
Weightsproprietaryproprietary
Runs locallynono
Price$0.017 per audio minute3 credits per second of audio; the dollar price and overage charges depend on the plan
Popularity (out of 100)340