Skip to main content

OpenAIAudio matchupReal-time voice dialog

GPT-Realtime 2.1vs.GPT-Live 1

Which model is better?

GPT-Realtime 2.1 and GPT-Live 1 each lead in different tests.

Independent tests
GPT-Realtime 2.10 of 3
GPT-Live 10 of 3
Speko, Cekura, Artificial Analysis
Popularity
GPT-Realtime 2.1ahead41
GPT-Live 10
out of 100
Weights and access
GPT-Realtime 2.1proprietary
GPT-Live 1n/a
Price
GPT-Realtime 2.1$4 input, $0.40 cached input, $24 output per 1M tokens
GPT-Live 1$0.05 per voice-session minute, billed per second. Backend model and tools cost extra.
verbatim from the provider

Pick GPT-Realtime 2.1 for

leaning Cekuramore popular

Pick GPT-Live 1 for

leaning Artificial Analysis

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

Speko

depends on the subtest

GPT-Live 1 is clearly ahead in 0 of 7 subtests and slightly in 3, GPT-Realtime 2.1 in 0 clearly and slightly in 2. 2 are level.

Speko S2S task-content latency p50

GPT-Realtime 2.11,145 ms
GPT-Live 11,892 ms

lower is better, as of October 28, 2026

Speko S2S first-sound latency p50

GPT-Realtime 2.11,022 ms
GPT-Live 11,482 ms

lower is better, as of October 28, 2026

Speko S2S confirmation-safe action success

GPT-Realtime 2.178.0
GPT-Live 190.0

as of October 28, 2026

Show all 7 subtests
SubtestGPT-Realtime 2.1GPT-Live 1Verdict
Speko S2S task-content latency p50 (lower is better)1,145 ms1,892 msGPT-Realtime 2.1 slightly ahead
Speko S2S first-sound latency p50 (lower is better)1,022 ms1,482 msGPT-Realtime 2.1 slightly ahead
Speko S2S confirmation-safe action success78.090.0GPT-Live 1 slightly ahead
Speko S2S overall call quality84.088.0GPT-Live 1 slightly ahead
Speko S2S task capability mean86.090.0GPT-Live 1 slightly ahead
Speko S2S scripted call completion100.0 %98.0 %level
Speko S2S booking before caller confirmation (lower is better)0.0 %0.0 %level

Source · latest October 28, 2026

Cekura

GPT-Realtime 2.1 slightly ahead

GPT-Realtime 2.1 is clearly ahead in 0 of 4 subtests and slightly in 1, GPT-Live 1 in none. 3 are level.

Cekura TurnBench end-of-turn score, Loud noise

GPT-Realtime 2.184.0 %
GPT-Live 181.0 %

36 tasks, as of October 23, 2026

Cekura TurnBench end-of-turn score, Light noise

GPT-Realtime 2.183.0 %
GPT-Live 185.0 %

36 tasks, as of October 23, 2026

Cekura TurnBench end-of-turn score, Echoey rooms

GPT-Realtime 2.188.0 %
GPT-Live 186.0 %

36 tasks, as of October 23, 2026

Show all 4 subtests
SubtestGPT-Realtime 2.1GPT-Live 1Verdict
Cekura TurnBench end-of-turn score, Loud noise84.0 %81.0 %GPT-Realtime 2.1 slightly ahead
Cekura TurnBench end-of-turn score, Light noise83.0 %85.0 %level
Cekura TurnBench end-of-turn score, Echoey rooms88.0 %86.0 %level
Cekura TurnBench end-of-turn score, six-condition average85.0 %84.0 %level

Source · latest October 23, 2026

Artificial Analysis

GPT-Live 1 slightly ahead

Artificial Analysis Speech Agent Arena preference Elo

GPT-Realtime 2.1937
GPT-Live 11,037

as of October 28, 2026

Source · latest October 28, 2026

All data side by side

Prices are verbatim from the provider, because audio models bill per minute, character or token.

GPT-Realtime 2.1GPT-Live 1
TaskReal-time voice dialogReal-time voice dialog
DeveloperOpenAIOpenAI
StatusActiveActive
Releasedn/aSeptember 10, 2026
Weightsproprietaryn/a
Runs locallynono
Price$4 input, $0.40 cached input, $24 output per 1M tokens$0.05 per voice-session minute, billed per second. Backend model and tools cost extra.
Popularity (out of 100)410