Skip to main content

GoogleMicrosoftAudio matchupSpeech to text

Gemini 3.5 Transcribevs.MAI-Transcribe-2

Which model is better?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and MAI-Transcribe-2 perform about the same in independent tests.

Independent tests
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe0 of 1
MAI-Transcribe-20 of 1
Appen MedTerm-90
Popularity
Gemini 3.5 Transcribeahead52
MAI-Transcribe-20
out of 100
Weights and access
Gemini 3.5 Transcribeproprietary
MAI-Transcribe-2proprietary
Price
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe$2 per 1M audio tokens ($0.003 per audio minute)
MAI-Transcribe-2$0.10 per hour of audio as an introductory price
verbatim from the provider

Pick Gemini 3.5 Transcribe for

more popular

Pick MAI-Transcribe-2 for

No clear edge

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

Appen MedTerm-90

level

Appen MedTerm-90 overall clinical entity recall

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe80.7 %
MAI-Transcribe-281.3 %

95 % ranges 79.5 % to 81.8 % and 80.5 % to 82.1 %, 30,017 tasks, as of October 16, 2026

Source · latest October 16, 2026

All data side by side

Prices are verbatim from the provider, because audio models bill per minute, character or token.

Gemini 3.5 TranscribeMAI-Transcribe-2
TaskSpeech to textSpeech to text
DeveloperGoogleMicrosoft
StatusActivePreview
Releasedn/aSeptember 3, 2026
Weightsproprietaryproprietary
Runs locallynono
Price$2 per 1M audio tokens ($0.003 per audio minute)$0.10 per hour of audio as an introductory price
Popularity (out of 100)520