Skip to main content

DeepgramMicrosoftAudio matchupSpeech output

Aura-2vs.MAI-Voice-2.1

Which model is better?

MAI-Voice-2.1 is slightly ahead in independent tests, but the lead is not certain.

Independent tests
Aura-20 of 1
MAI-Voice-2.10 of 1
Cekura
Popularity
Aura-2ahead44
MAI-Voice-2.11
out of 100
Weights and access
Aura-2proprietary
MAI-Voice-2.1proprietary
Price
Aura-2n/a
MAI-Voice-2.1$22 per 1M characters
verbatim from the provider

Pick Aura-2 for

more popular

Pick MAI-Voice-2.1 for

leaning Cekura

Shared tests

Independent evaluators and leaderboards only, the newest shared snapshot per evaluator. With 95 % ranges a lead counts when they do not overlap; for hit rates, when it holds in a 95 % test. Without any uncertainty figure at most “slightly ahead”.

Cekura

MAI-Voice-2.1 slightly ahead

MAI-Voice-2.1 is clearly ahead in 0 of 4 subtests and slightly in 2, Aura-2 in 0 clearly and slightly in 1. 1 is level.

Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: codes and addresses

Aura-287.0 %
MAI-Voice-2.167.0 %

as of October 19, 2026

Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: numbers and shorthand

Aura-271.0 %
MAI-Voice-2.185.0 %

as of October 19, 2026

Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: medical terms

Aura-286.0 %
MAI-Voice-2.199.0 %

as of October 19, 2026

Show all 4 subtests
SubtestAura-2MAI-Voice-2.1Verdict
Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: codes and addresses87.0 %67.0 %Aura-2 slightly ahead
Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: numbers and shorthand71.0 %85.0 %MAI-Voice-2.1 slightly ahead
Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: medical terms86.0 %99.0 %MAI-Voice-2.1 slightly ahead
Cekura TTS hard-part accuracy: read from context75.0 %73.0 %level

Source · latest October 19, 2026

All data side by side

Prices are verbatim from the provider, because audio models bill per minute, character or token.

Aura-2MAI-Voice-2.1
TaskSpeech outputSpeech output
DeveloperDeepgramMicrosoft
StatusActivePreview
Releasedn/aOctober 1, 2026
Weightsproprietaryproprietary
Runs locallynono
Pricen/a$22 per 1M characters
Popularity (out of 100)441